Mitoma vs Crysencio Summerville: Gameweek 32 Analysis
| Photo | Player | GW xPts | Form | Season Pts | Goals | Assists | Pts per £m | Ownership | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | Mitoma MID - BHA | 1 | 0.5 | 51 | 2 | 1 | 8.4 | 1.9% | £6.1m |
 | Summerville MID - WHU | 0.2 | 0.0 | 92 | 5 | 3 | 16.7 | 1.5% | £5.5m |
TOO CLOSE TO CALL
Mitoma and Crysencio Summerville are closely matched in Gameweek 32. Both carry similar expected returns, form, and fixture difficulty. This one comes down to your squad needs and risk tolerance.
- Mitoma projects 0.8 more expected points in GW32.
Fixture run - next 4 gameweeks
Mitoma
GW32
Burnley
Away
GW33
Spurs
Away
GW34
No fixture
GW35
Newcastle
Away
Summerville
GW32
Wolves
Home
GW33
Crystal Palace
Away
GW34
Everton
Home
GW35
Brentford
Away
The case for each player
Mitoma
- Mitoma has registered 2 goals and 1 assists this season, totalling 51 points at £6.1m.
- Expected to score 1.0 points in GW32, making Mitoma a viable starting option.
- With only 1.9% ownership, Mitoma offers differential value to boost your rank if they deliver.
Summerville
- Crysencio Summerville has registered 5 goals and 3 assists this season, totalling 92 points at £5.5m.
- Expected to score 0.2 points in GW32, making Summerville a viable starting option.
- With only 1.5% ownership, Summerville offers differential value to boost your rank if they deliver.
Mitoma vs Summerville Gameweek 32
Click a question below and get the full breakdown.
CF
I've pulled the latest GW32 data for Mitoma and Crysencio Summerville. The verdict is below - click any question for more detail.
Ask a question
ChatFPL AI
Still not sure who to pick between Mitoma and Summerville?
ChatFPL AI analyses your actual squad and budget to recommend the best transfer for your specific team.
Try ChatFPL AI for free