FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 6

Across the season, Erling Haaland leads on total points and the gap stands at 19. On attacking output, Erling Haaland edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Thierno Barry has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Erling Haaland has 4 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 7.9% for Thierno Barry and 73.3% for Erling Haaland, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.6 expected points for Erling Haaland.

|

Priced at £12.0m and £7.0m, there is a £5.0m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Dominik Szoboszlai generates more points per million this season. Bruno Fernandes at 2.4 against Dominik Szoboszlai at 2.6. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Bruno Fernandes the edge at 5.8 projected points. With ownership at 39.9% and 34.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Riccardo Calafiori at 5.6 for Gameweek 6, against 5.2 for Marc Guéhi, a gap of 0.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Riccardo Calafiori has averaged 5.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Marc Guéhi is averaging 5.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Morgan Rogers leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Cole Palmer edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Cole Palmer has 2 goals and 2 assists this season; Morgan Rogers has 3 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 27% for Cole Palmer and 40% for Morgan Rogers, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.8 expected points for Morgan Rogers.

|

Priced at £7.8m and £9.7m, there is a £1.9m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Rayan Cherki generates more points per million this season. Rayan Cherki at 3.3 against Cole Palmer at 2.9. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Cole Palmer the edge at 5.6 projected points. With ownership at 28% and 27% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Bruno Fernandes at 5.8 for Gameweek 6, against 3.2 for Antoine Semenyo, a gap of 2.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Bruno Fernandes has averaged 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Antoine Semenyo is averaging 3.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Joško Gvardiol leads on total points and the gap stands at 9. On attacking output, Joško Gvardiol edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Gabriel has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Joško Gvardiol has 1 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 23.1% for Gabriel and 25.9% for Joško Gvardiol, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.6 expected points for Joško Gvardiol.

|

Priced at £5.7m and £9.7m, there is a £4.0m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Pascal Groß at 5.8 against Cole Palmer at 2.9. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Pascal Groß the edge at 6.6 projected points. With ownership at 21.5% and 27% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Martin Ødegaard at 5.4 for Gameweek 6, against 4.6 for Bryan Mbeumo, a gap of 0.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Martin Ødegaard has averaged 5.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Bryan Mbeumo is averaging 4.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Joško Gvardiol leads on total points and the gap stands at 7. On attacking output, Joško Gvardiol edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Semi Ajayi has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Joško Gvardiol has 1 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 14.3% for Semi Ajayi and 25.9% for Joško Gvardiol, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.6 expected points for Joško Gvardiol.

|

Priced at £5.7m and £6.1m, there is a £0.4m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Joško Gvardiol generates more points per million this season. Joško Gvardiol at 5.8 against James Tarkowski at 4.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Joško Gvardiol the edge at 6.6 projected points. With ownership at 25.9% and 14.1% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Maxim De Cuyper at 6.4 for Gameweek 6, against 5.2 for Semi Ajayi, a gap of 1.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Maxim De Cuyper has averaged 6.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Semi Ajayi is averaging 5.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Gabriel leads on total points and the gap stands at 7. On attacking output, Gabriel edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Gabriel has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Virgil has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 23.1% for Gabriel and 16.4% for Virgil, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 4.8 expected points for Gabriel.

|

Priced at £8.0m and £5.2m, there is a £2.8m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Lewis Hall generates more points per million this season. Gabriel at 3 against Lewis Hall at 3.5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Gabriel the edge at 4.8 projected points. With ownership at 23.1% and 14.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Martin Ødegaard at 5.4 for Gameweek 6, against 5.2 for Morgan Gibbs-White, a gap of 0.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Martin Ødegaard has averaged 5.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Morgan Gibbs-White is averaging 5.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Martin Ødegaard leads on total points and the gap stands at 11. On attacking output, Martin Ødegaard edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Martin Ødegaard has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Antoine Semenyo has 0 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 20.1% for Martin Ødegaard and 14.7% for Antoine Semenyo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.4 expected points for Martin Ødegaard.

|

Priced at £6.0m and £7.6m, there is a £1.6m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Dominic Calvert-Lewin generates more points per million this season. Dominic Calvert-Lewin at 3.3 against Kai Havertz at 2.2. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Dominic Calvert-Lewin the edge at 4.0 projected points. With ownership at 25.7% and 8.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Semi Ajayi at 5.2 for Gameweek 6, against 2.2 for Ezri Konsa, a gap of 3.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Semi Ajayi has averaged 5.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Ezri Konsa is averaging 2.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Alexander Isak leads on total points and the gap stands at 8. On attacking output, Alexander Isak edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Kai Havertz has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Alexander Isak has 3 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 8.5% for Kai Havertz and 21.9% for Alexander Isak, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.0 expected points for Alexander Isak.

|

Priced at £7.8m and £6.2m, there is a £1.6m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Yoane Wissa generates more points per million this season. Igor Thiago at 1.3 against Yoane Wissa at 2.4. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Yoane Wissa the edge at 3.0 projected points. With ownership at 8.9% and 19.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Kai Havertz the clear short-term pick. Kai Havertz carries 3.4 expected points and 3.4 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Gonzalo leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, Gonzalo edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Gonzalo has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Igor Thiago has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 3.7% for Gonzalo and 8.9% for Igor Thiago, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 2.4 expected points for Gonzalo.

|

Priced at £6.0m and £7.6m, there is a £1.6m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Kai Havertz generates more points per million this season. Gonzalo at 2 against Kai Havertz at 2.2. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Kai Havertz the edge at 3.4 projected points. With ownership at 3.7% and 8.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Brian Brobbey the clear short-term pick. Brian Brobbey carries 1.4 expected points and 1.4 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Gonzalo leads on total points and the gap stands at 5. On attacking output, Gonzalo edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Brian Brobbey has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Gonzalo has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 5.4% for Brian Brobbey and 3.7% for Gonzalo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 2.4 expected points for Gonzalo.

|