FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 4

The expected points model has Erling Haaland at 8.0 for Gameweek 4, against 7.0 for João Pedro, a gap of 1.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Erling Haaland has averaged 8.0 points per game over the last 3 gameweeks, while João Pedro is averaging 7.0 points per game over the last 3 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Alexander Isak leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, João Pedro edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Alexander Isak has 3 goals and 0 assists this season; João Pedro has 2 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 21.6% for Alexander Isak and 72.7% for João Pedro, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 4, the model projects 7.7 expected points for Alexander Isak.

|

Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 4 with no fixture scheduled, making Erling Haaland the clear short-term pick. Erling Haaland carries 8.0 expected points and 8.0 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|

The expected points model has Erling Haaland at 8.0 for Gameweek 4, against 4.0 for Thierno Barry, a gap of 4.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Erling Haaland has averaged 8.0 points per game over the last 3 gameweeks, while Thierno Barry is averaging 4.0 points per game over the last 3 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Bruno Fernandes leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Bruno Fernandes edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Bruno Fernandes has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Cole Palmer has 2 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 45% for Bruno Fernandes and 24% for Cole Palmer, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 4, the model projects 9.0 expected points for Bruno Fernandes.

|

Priced at £5.8m and £4.8m, there is a £1.0m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Maxim De Cuyper generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 3.8 against Maxim De Cuyper at 4.4. The Gameweek 4 expected points model gives Riccardo Calafiori the edge at 7.3 projected points. With ownership at 48.2% and 20.6% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Rayan Cherki at 8.3 for Gameweek 4, against 5.0 for Dominik Szoboszlai, a gap of 3.3 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Rayan Cherki has averaged 8.3 points per game over the last 3 gameweeks, while Dominik Szoboszlai is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last 3 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Cole Palmer leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Cole Palmer edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Cole Palmer has 2 goals and 1 assists this season; Dominik Szoboszlai has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 24% for Cole Palmer and 38.4% for Dominik Szoboszlai, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 4, the model projects 7.0 expected points for Cole Palmer.

|

Priced at £7.8m and £7.6m, there is a £0.2m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Rayan Cherki generates more points per million this season. Rayan Cherki at 3.2 against Morgan Rogers at 2.5. The Gameweek 4 expected points model gives Rayan Cherki the edge at 8.3 projected points. With ownership at 29.9% and 30.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Bryan Mbeumo at 7.0 for Gameweek 4, against 7.0 for Cole Palmer, a gap of 0.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Bryan Mbeumo has averaged 7.0 points per game over the last 3 gameweeks, while Cole Palmer is averaging 7.0 points per game over the last 3 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Rayan Cherki leads on total points and the gap stands at 12. On attacking output, Rayan Cherki edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Rayan Cherki has 2 goals and 2 assists this season; Antoine Semenyo has 0 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 29.9% for Rayan Cherki and 17.4% for Antoine Semenyo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 4, the model projects 8.3 expected points for Rayan Cherki.

|

Priced at £7.8m and £6.7m, there is a £1.1m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Martin Ødegaard generates more points per million this season. Rayan Cherki at 3.2 against Martin Ødegaard at 3.6. The Gameweek 4 expected points model gives Rayan Cherki the edge at 8.3 projected points. With ownership at 29.9% and 15.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Bryan Mbeumo at 7.0 for Gameweek 4, against 4.3 for Antoine Semenyo, a gap of 2.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Bryan Mbeumo has averaged 7.0 points per game over the last 3 gameweeks, while Antoine Semenyo is averaging 4.3 points per game over the last 3 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Maxim De Cuyper leads on total points and the gap stands at 14. On attacking output, Maxim De Cuyper edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Maxim De Cuyper has 1 goals and 2 assists this season; Issa Diop has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 20.6% for Maxim De Cuyper and 14.6% for Issa Diop, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 4, the model projects 7.0 expected points for Maxim De Cuyper.

|

Priced at £4.0m and £5.6m, there is a £1.6m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Joško Gvardiol generates more points per million this season. Issa Diop at 1.8 against Joško Gvardiol at 3.9. The Gameweek 4 expected points model gives Joško Gvardiol the edge at 7.3 projected points. With ownership at 14.6% and 19.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Antoine Semenyo at 4.3 for Gameweek 4, against 3.7 for Christos Tzolis, a gap of 0.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Antoine Semenyo has averaged 4.3 points per game over the last 3 gameweeks, while Christos Tzolis is averaging 3.7 points per game over the last 3 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Joško Gvardiol leads on total points and the gap stands at 15. On attacking output, Joško Gvardiol edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Joško Gvardiol has 1 goals and 1 assists this season; Luke Shaw has 0 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 19.9% for Joško Gvardiol and 13.4% for Luke Shaw, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 4, the model projects 7.3 expected points for Joško Gvardiol.

|

Priced at £9.1m and £7.9m, there is a £1.2m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Alexander Isak generates more points per million this season. Alexander Isak at 2.5 against Igor Thiago at 0.5. The Gameweek 4 expected points model gives Alexander Isak the edge at 7.7 projected points. With ownership at 21.6% and 11.6% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Marc Guéhi at 6.7 for Gameweek 4, against 1.7 for Ezri Konsa, a gap of 5.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Marc Guéhi has averaged 6.7 points per game over the last 3 gameweeks, while Ezri Konsa is averaging 1.7 points per game over the last 3 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Martin Ødegaard leads on total points and the gap stands at 13. On attacking output, Martin Ødegaard edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Martin Ødegaard has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Christos Tzolis has 0 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 15.5% for Martin Ødegaard and 16.9% for Christos Tzolis, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 4, the model projects 8.0 expected points for Martin Ødegaard.

|

Priced at £6.7m and £5.6m, there is a £1.1m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Martin Ødegaard generates more points per million this season. Martin Ødegaard at 3.6 against Pascal Groß at 2.9. The Gameweek 4 expected points model gives Martin Ødegaard the edge at 8.0 projected points. With ownership at 15.5% and 16.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 4 with no fixture scheduled, making Dominic Calvert-Lewin the clear short-term pick. Dominic Calvert-Lewin carries 3.3 expected points and 3.3 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Alexander Isak leads on total points and the gap stands at 7. On attacking output, Alexander Isak edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Kai Havertz has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Alexander Isak has 3 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 7.7% for Kai Havertz and 21.6% for Alexander Isak, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 4, the model projects 7.7 expected points for Alexander Isak.

|

Priced at £4.0m and £5.1m, there is a £1.1m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Lewis Hall generates more points per million this season. Issa Diop at 1.8 against Lewis Hall at 3.5. The Gameweek 4 expected points model gives Lewis Hall the edge at 6.0 projected points. With ownership at 14.6% and 12.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Kai Havertz at 5.3 for Gameweek 4, against 2.0 for Brian Brobbey, a gap of 3.3 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Kai Havertz has averaged 5.3 points per game over the last 3 gameweeks, while Brian Brobbey is averaging 2.0 points per game over the last 3 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|