FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 2

Across the season, João Pedro leads on total points and the gap stands at 9. On attacking output, João Pedro edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Erling Haaland has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; João Pedro has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 68.4% for Erling Haaland and 66.1% for João Pedro, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 4.0 expected points for Erling Haaland.

|

Priced at £9.0m and £7.5m, there is a £1.5m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, João Pedro generates more points per million this season. Alexander Isak at 0.2 against João Pedro at 1.5. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Alexander Isak the edge at 2.7 projected points. With ownership at 16.7% and 66.1% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Bryan Mbeumo at 2.8 for Gameweek 2, against 2.5 for Dominik Szoboszlai, a gap of 0.3 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Dominik Szoboszlai has averaged 8.0 points per game so far this season, while Bryan Mbeumo is averaging 2.0 points per game so far this season. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Erling Haaland leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, Erling Haaland edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Erling Haaland has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Jonah Kusi-Asare has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 68.4% for Erling Haaland and 7.1% for Jonah Kusi-Asare, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 4.0 expected points for Erling Haaland.

|

Priced at £12.0m and £6.5m, there is a £5.5m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Christos Tzolis generates more points per million this season. Bruno Fernandes at 0.2 against Christos Tzolis at 0.9. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Bruno Fernandes the edge at 4.0 projected points. With ownership at 49.4% and 25.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Dominik Szoboszlai at 2.5 for Gameweek 2, against 2.3 for Christos Tzolis, a gap of 0.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Dominik Szoboszlai has averaged 8.0 points per game so far this season, while Christos Tzolis is averaging 6.0 points per game so far this season. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Iliman Ndiaye leads on total points and the gap stands at 7. On attacking output, Iliman Ndiaye edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Bruno Fernandes has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Iliman Ndiaye has 0 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 49.4% for Bruno Fernandes and 16.1% for Iliman Ndiaye, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 4.0 expected points for Bruno Fernandes.

|

Priced at £8.0m and £6.5m, there is a £1.5m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Christos Tzolis generates more points per million this season. Bryan Mbeumo at 0.3 against Christos Tzolis at 0.9. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Bryan Mbeumo the edge at 2.8 projected points. With ownership at 36.8% and 25.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Antoine Semenyo at 2.9 for Gameweek 2, against 2.8 for Bryan Mbeumo, a gap of 0.1 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Bryan Mbeumo has averaged 2.0 points per game so far this season, while Antoine Semenyo is averaging 2.0 points per game so far this season. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Christos Tzolis leads on total points and the gap stands at 4. On attacking output, Christos Tzolis edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Antoine Semenyo has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Christos Tzolis has 0 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 25% for Antoine Semenyo and 25.8% for Christos Tzolis, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.9 expected points for Antoine Semenyo.

|

Priced at £4.0m and £8.0m, there is a £4.0m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Gabriel generates more points per million this season. Issa Diop at 0.5 against Gabriel at 0.6. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Gabriel the edge at 4.0 projected points. With ownership at 17.6% and 29.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Antoine Semenyo at 2.9 for Gameweek 2, against 2.2 for Iliman Ndiaye, a gap of 0.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Iliman Ndiaye has averaged 9.0 points per game so far this season, while Antoine Semenyo is averaging 2.0 points per game so far this season. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Cole Palmer leads on total points and the gap stands at 11. On attacking output, Cole Palmer edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Cole Palmer has 1 goals and 1 assists this season; Antoine Semenyo has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 13.1% for Cole Palmer and 25% for Antoine Semenyo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 3.2 expected points for Cole Palmer.

|

Priced at £6.0m and £4.5m, there is a £1.5m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Dominic Calvert-Lewin generates more points per million this season. Dominic Calvert-Lewin at 0.2 against Jonah Kusi-Asare at 0. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Dominic Calvert-Lewin the edge at 2.0 projected points. With ownership at 29.6% and 7.1% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Kai Havertz at 2.4 for Gameweek 2, against 2.0 for Dominic Calvert-Lewin, a gap of 0.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Kai Havertz has averaged 6.0 points per game so far this season, while Dominic Calvert-Lewin is averaging 1.0 points per game so far this season. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Issa Diop leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Issa Diop edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Issa Diop has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Harry Maguire has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 17.6% for Issa Diop and 17.5% for Harry Maguire, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.2 expected points for Harry Maguire.

|

Priced at £6.5m and £5.5m, there is a £1.0m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Nico O'Reilly generates more points per million this season. Nico O'Reilly at 0.3 against Pedro Porro at 0. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Nico O'Reilly the edge at 3.1 projected points. With ownership at 21.1% and 13.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Luke Shaw at 1.7 for Gameweek 2, against 1.0 for Milan van Ewijk, a gap of 0.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Luke Shaw has averaged 1.0 points per game so far this season, while Milan van Ewijk is averaging 1.0 points per game so far this season. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Virgil leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Milan van Ewijk edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Milan van Ewijk has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Virgil has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 13.3% for Milan van Ewijk and 19.6% for Virgil, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 3.1 expected points for Virgil.

|

Priced at £6.0m and £5.5m, there is a £0.5m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Marc Guéhi generates more points per million this season. Marc Guéhi at 1.7 against Pedro Porro at 0. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Marc Guéhi the edge at 2.8 projected points. With ownership at 18.7% and 13.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Pedro Porro at 2.5 for Gameweek 2, against 2.2 for Harry Maguire, a gap of 0.3 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Harry Maguire has averaged 1.0 points per game so far this season, while Pedro Porro is averaging 0.0 points per game so far this season. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Igor Thiago leads on total points and the gap stands at 0. On attacking output, Igor Thiago edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Igor Thiago has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Ollie Watkins has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 17% for Igor Thiago and 9.1% for Ollie Watkins, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.5 expected points for Igor Thiago.

|

Priced at £7.5m and £8.0m, there is a £0.5m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Viktor Gyökeres generates more points per million this season. Viktor Gyökeres at 0 against Igor Thiago at 0. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Igor Thiago the edge at 2.5 projected points. With ownership at 7.6% and 17% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Igor Thiago at 2.5 for Gameweek 2, against 2.4 for Kai Havertz, a gap of 0.1 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Kai Havertz has averaged 6.0 points per game so far this season, while Igor Thiago is averaging 0.0 points per game so far this season. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Kai Havertz leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Kai Havertz edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Kai Havertz has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Ollie Watkins has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 7% for Kai Havertz and 9.1% for Ollie Watkins, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.5 expected points for Ollie Watkins.

|