FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 4

The expected points model has Erling Haaland at 8.0 for Gameweek 4, against 7.7 for Alexander Isak, a gap of 0.3 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Erling Haaland has averaged 8.0 points per game over the last 3 gameweeks, while Alexander Isak is averaging 7.7 points per game over the last 3 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, João Pedro leads on total points and the gap stands at 15. On attacking output, João Pedro edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Brian Brobbey has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; João Pedro has 2 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 7.9% for Brian Brobbey and 72.4% for João Pedro, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 4, the model projects 7.0 expected points for João Pedro.

|

Priced at £5.6m and £7.7m, there is a £2.1m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, João Pedro generates more points per million this season. Thierno Barry at 2.1 against João Pedro at 2.7. The Gameweek 4 expected points model gives João Pedro the edge at 7.0 projected points. With ownership at 5.5% and 72.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Riccardo Calafiori at 7.3 for Gameweek 4, against 3.0 for Virgil, a gap of 4.3 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Riccardo Calafiori has averaged 7.3 points per game over the last 3 gameweeks, while Virgil is averaging 3.0 points per game over the last 3 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Riccardo Calafiori leads on total points and the gap stands at 15. On attacking output, Riccardo Calafiori edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Riccardo Calafiori has 0 goals and 2 assists this season; Issa Diop has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 47.7% for Riccardo Calafiori and 14.8% for Issa Diop, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 4, the model projects 7.3 expected points for Riccardo Calafiori.

|

Priced at £5.7m and £4.4m, there is a £1.3m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Riccardo Calafiori generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 3.9 against Luke Shaw at 1.6. The Gameweek 4 expected points model gives Riccardo Calafiori the edge at 7.3 projected points. With ownership at 47.7% and 13.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Cole Palmer at 7.0 for Gameweek 4, against 5.0 for Dominik Szoboszlai, a gap of 2.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Cole Palmer has averaged 7.0 points per game over the last 3 gameweeks, while Dominik Szoboszlai is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last 3 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Riccardo Calafiori leads on total points and the gap stands at 15. On attacking output, Riccardo Calafiori edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Riccardo Calafiori has 0 goals and 2 assists this season; Harry Maguire has 0 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 47.7% for Riccardo Calafiori and 12.4% for Harry Maguire, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 4, the model projects 7.3 expected points for Riccardo Calafiori.

|

Priced at £5.5m and £7.0m, there is a £1.5m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Pascal Groß at 2.9 against Dominik Szoboszlai at 2.1. The Gameweek 4 expected points model gives Pascal Groß the edge at 5.3 projected points. With ownership at 16.2% and 38.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Cody Gakpo at 9.3 for Gameweek 4, against 8.3 for Rayan Cherki, a gap of 1.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Cody Gakpo has averaged 9.3 points per game over the last 3 gameweeks, while Rayan Cherki is averaging 8.3 points per game over the last 3 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Maxim De Cuyper leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Maxim De Cuyper edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Maxim De Cuyper has 1 goals and 2 assists this season; Gabriel has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 19.8% for Maxim De Cuyper and 24.8% for Gabriel, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 4, the model projects 7.0 expected points for Maxim De Cuyper.

|

Priced at £5.5m and £7.6m, there is a £2.1m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Pascal Groß at 2.9 against Morgan Rogers at 2.5. The Gameweek 4 expected points model gives Morgan Rogers the edge at 6.3 projected points. With ownership at 16.2% and 28.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Marc Guéhi at 6.7 for Gameweek 4, against 5.0 for Gabriel, a gap of 1.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Marc Guéhi has averaged 6.7 points per game over the last 3 gameweeks, while Gabriel is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last 3 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Cody Gakpo leads on total points and the gap stands at 9. On attacking output, Cody Gakpo edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Cody Gakpo has 1 goals and 3 assists this season; Morgan Rogers has 2 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 14.5% for Cody Gakpo and 28.4% for Morgan Rogers, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 4, the model projects 9.3 expected points for Cody Gakpo.

|

Priced at £4.8m and £6.0m, there is a £1.2m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Maxim De Cuyper generates more points per million this season. Maxim De Cuyper at 4.4 against Marc Guéhi at 3.3. The Gameweek 4 expected points model gives Maxim De Cuyper the edge at 7.0 projected points. With ownership at 19.8% and 18.6% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Antoine Semenyo at 4.3 for Gameweek 4, against 3.7 for Christos Tzolis, a gap of 0.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Antoine Semenyo has averaged 4.3 points per game over the last 3 gameweeks, while Christos Tzolis is averaging 3.7 points per game over the last 3 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Maxim De Cuyper leads on total points and the gap stands at 14. On attacking output, Maxim De Cuyper edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Maxim De Cuyper has 1 goals and 2 assists this season; Luke Shaw has 0 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 19.8% for Maxim De Cuyper and 13.9% for Luke Shaw, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 4, the model projects 7.0 expected points for Maxim De Cuyper.

|

Priced at £4.0m and £6.0m, there is a £2.0m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Marc Guéhi generates more points per million this season. Issa Diop at 1.8 against Marc Guéhi at 3.3. The Gameweek 4 expected points model gives Marc Guéhi the edge at 6.7 projected points. With ownership at 14.8% and 18.6% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Dominic Calvert-Lewin at 3.3 for Gameweek 4, against 2.0 for Brian Brobbey, a gap of 1.3 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Dominic Calvert-Lewin has averaged 3.3 points per game over the last 3 gameweeks, while Brian Brobbey is averaging 2.0 points per game over the last 3 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 4 with no fixture scheduled, making Dominic Calvert-Lewin the clear short-term pick. Dominic Calvert-Lewin carries 3.3 expected points and 3.3 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|

Priced at £4.0m and £4.4m, there is a £0.4m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Issa Diop generates more points per million this season. Issa Diop at 1.8 against Luke Shaw at 1.6. The Gameweek 4 expected points model gives Issa Diop the edge at 2.3 projected points. With ownership at 14.8% and 13.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Issa Diop at 2.3 for Gameweek 4, against 1.7 for Ezri Konsa, a gap of 0.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Issa Diop has averaged 2.3 points per game over the last 3 gameweeks, while Ezri Konsa is averaging 1.7 points per game over the last 3 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Luke Shaw leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, Luke Shaw edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Ezri Konsa has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Luke Shaw has 0 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 13.3% for Ezri Konsa and 13.9% for Luke Shaw, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 4, the model projects 2.3 expected points for Luke Shaw.

|

Priced at £5.6m and £9.1m, there is a £3.5m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Alexander Isak generates more points per million this season. Thierno Barry at 2.1 against Alexander Isak at 2.5. The Gameweek 4 expected points model gives Alexander Isak the edge at 7.7 projected points. With ownership at 5.5% and 20.6% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 4 with no fixture scheduled, making Thierno Barry the clear short-term pick. Thierno Barry carries 4.0 expected points and 4.0 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|