FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 4

Priced at £5.9m and £15.5m, there is a £9.6m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Erling Haaland generates more points per million this season. Brian Brobbey at 1 against Erling Haaland at 1.5. The Gameweek 4 expected points model gives Erling Haaland the edge at 8.0 projected points. With ownership at 8.1% and 71.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Erling Haaland at 8.0 for Gameweek 4, against 5.3 for Kai Havertz, a gap of 2.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Erling Haaland has averaged 8.0 points per game over the last 3 gameweeks, while Kai Havertz is averaging 5.3 points per game over the last 3 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Bruno Fernandes leads on total points and the gap stands at 8. On attacking output, Bruno Fernandes edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Bruno Fernandes has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Morgan Rogers has 2 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 46.7% for Bruno Fernandes and 27.9% for Morgan Rogers, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 4, the model projects 9.0 expected points for Bruno Fernandes.

|

Priced at £12.0m and £7.9m, there is a £4.1m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Bryan Mbeumo generates more points per million this season. Bruno Fernandes at 2.3 against Bryan Mbeumo at 2.7. The Gameweek 4 expected points model gives Bruno Fernandes the edge at 9.0 projected points. With ownership at 46.7% and 25.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Bruno Fernandes at 9.0 for Gameweek 4, against 7.0 for Cole Palmer, a gap of 2.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Bruno Fernandes has averaged 9.0 points per game over the last 3 gameweeks, while Cole Palmer is averaging 7.0 points per game over the last 3 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Riccardo Calafiori leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Maxim De Cuyper edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Riccardo Calafiori has 0 goals and 2 assists this season; Maxim De Cuyper has 1 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 47.4% for Riccardo Calafiori and 19.4% for Maxim De Cuyper, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 4, the model projects 7.3 expected points for Riccardo Calafiori.

|

Priced at £5.7m and £6.5m, there is a £0.8m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Riccardo Calafiori generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 3.9 against Virgil at 1.4. The Gameweek 4 expected points model gives Riccardo Calafiori the edge at 7.3 projected points. With ownership at 47.4% and 17.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Bruno Fernandes at 9.0 for Gameweek 4, against 3.7 for Christos Tzolis, a gap of 5.3 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Bruno Fernandes has averaged 9.0 points per game over the last 3 gameweeks, while Christos Tzolis is averaging 3.7 points per game over the last 3 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Riccardo Calafiori leads on total points and the gap stands at 15. On attacking output, Riccardo Calafiori edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Riccardo Calafiori has 0 goals and 2 assists this season; Issa Diop has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 47.4% for Riccardo Calafiori and 15% for Issa Diop, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 4, the model projects 7.3 expected points for Riccardo Calafiori.

|

Priced at £5.5m and £7.0m, there is a £1.5m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Pascal Groß at 2.9 against Dominik Szoboszlai at 2.1. The Gameweek 4 expected points model gives Pascal Groß the edge at 5.3 projected points. With ownership at 16.2% and 38.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Bryan Mbeumo at 7.0 for Gameweek 4, against 7.0 for Cole Palmer, a gap of 0.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Bryan Mbeumo has averaged 7.0 points per game over the last 3 gameweeks, while Cole Palmer is averaging 7.0 points per game over the last 3 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Bryan Mbeumo leads on total points and the gap stands at 8. On attacking output, Bryan Mbeumo edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Bryan Mbeumo has 2 goals and 1 assists this season; Antoine Semenyo has 0 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 25.8% for Bryan Mbeumo and 18.2% for Antoine Semenyo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 4, the model projects 7.0 expected points for Bryan Mbeumo.

|

Priced at £6.0m and £6.2m, there is a £0.2m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Yoane Wissa generates more points per million this season. Dominic Calvert-Lewin at 1.7 against Yoane Wissa at 2.1. The Gameweek 4 expected points model gives Yoane Wissa the edge at 4.3 projected points. With ownership at 24.2% and 16.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Maxim De Cuyper at 7.0 for Gameweek 4, against 6.7 for Marc Guéhi, a gap of 0.3 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Maxim De Cuyper has averaged 7.0 points per game over the last 3 gameweeks, while Marc Guéhi is averaging 6.7 points per game over the last 3 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Maxim De Cuyper leads on total points and the gap stands at 14. On attacking output, Maxim De Cuyper edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Maxim De Cuyper has 1 goals and 2 assists this season; Issa Diop has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 19.4% for Maxim De Cuyper and 15% for Issa Diop, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 4, the model projects 7.0 expected points for Maxim De Cuyper.

|

Priced at £5.6m and £4.9m, there is a £0.7m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Joško Gvardiol generates more points per million this season. Joško Gvardiol at 3.9 against Harry Maguire at 1.4. The Gameweek 4 expected points model gives Joško Gvardiol the edge at 7.3 projected points. With ownership at 19.8% and 12.6% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Dominic Calvert-Lewin at 3.3 for Gameweek 4, against 2.0 for Brian Brobbey, a gap of 1.3 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Dominic Calvert-Lewin has averaged 3.3 points per game over the last 3 gameweeks, while Brian Brobbey is averaging 2.0 points per game over the last 3 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Virgil leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, Issa Diop edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Issa Diop has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Virgil has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 15% for Issa Diop and 17.3% for Virgil, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 4, the model projects 3.0 expected points for Virgil.

|

Priced at £4.8m and £4.9m, there is a £0.1m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Maxim De Cuyper generates more points per million this season. Maxim De Cuyper at 4.4 against Harry Maguire at 1.4. The Gameweek 4 expected points model gives Maxim De Cuyper the edge at 7.0 projected points. With ownership at 19.4% and 12.6% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Kai Havertz at 5.3 for Gameweek 4, against 3.3 for Dominic Calvert-Lewin, a gap of 2.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Kai Havertz has averaged 5.3 points per game over the last 3 gameweeks, while Dominic Calvert-Lewin is averaging 3.3 points per game over the last 3 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 4 with no fixture scheduled, making Dominic Calvert-Lewin the clear short-term pick. Dominic Calvert-Lewin carries 3.3 expected points and 3.3 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|

Priced at £5.6m and £9.1m, there is a £3.5m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Alexander Isak generates more points per million this season. Thierno Barry at 2.1 against Alexander Isak at 2.5. The Gameweek 4 expected points model gives Alexander Isak the edge at 7.7 projected points. With ownership at 5.4% and 20% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Kai Havertz at 5.3 for Gameweek 4, against 4.3 for Yoane Wissa, a gap of 1.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Kai Havertz has averaged 5.3 points per game over the last 3 gameweeks, while Yoane Wissa is averaging 4.3 points per game over the last 3 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Kai Havertz leads on total points and the gap stands at 12. On attacking output, Kai Havertz edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Kai Havertz has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Igor Thiago has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 7.4% for Kai Havertz and 12.1% for Igor Thiago, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 4, the model projects 5.3 expected points for Kai Havertz.

|

Priced at £5.9m and £7.5m, there is a £1.6m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Kai Havertz generates more points per million this season. Brian Brobbey at 1 against Kai Havertz at 2.1. The Gameweek 4 expected points model gives Kai Havertz the edge at 5.3 projected points. With ownership at 8.1% and 7.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|