FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 2

Priced at £9.0m and £7.5m, there is a £1.5m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Alexander Isak generates more points per million this season. Alexander Isak at 0.2 against João Pedro at 0. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Alexander Isak the edge at 2.7 projected points. With ownership at 17% and 64% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Bruno Fernandes at 4.0 for Gameweek 2, against 2.9 for Antoine Semenyo, a gap of 1.1 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Bruno Fernandes has averaged 2.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Antoine Semenyo is averaging 2.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Bruno Fernandes leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, Bruno Fernandes edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Bruno Fernandes has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Morgan Rogers has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 50.8% for Bruno Fernandes and 24.3% for Morgan Rogers, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 4.0 expected points for Bruno Fernandes.

|

Priced at £7.5m and £4.5m, there is a £3.0m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, João Pedro generates more points per million this season. João Pedro at 0 against Jonah Kusi-Asare at 0. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives João Pedro the edge at 2.4 projected points. With ownership at 64% and 7.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Bruno Fernandes at 4.0 for Gameweek 2, against 2.2 for Iliman Ndiaye, a gap of 1.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Iliman Ndiaye has averaged 9.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Bruno Fernandes is averaging 2.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Dominik Szoboszlai leads on total points and the gap stands at 8. On attacking output, Dominik Szoboszlai edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Morgan Rogers has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Dominik Szoboszlai has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 24.3% for Morgan Rogers and 42% for Dominik Szoboszlai, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.6 expected points for Morgan Rogers.

|

Priced at £12.0m and £5.5m, there is a £6.5m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Bruno Fernandes at 0.2 against Pascal Groß at 0.4. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Bruno Fernandes the edge at 4.0 projected points. With ownership at 50.8% and 14% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Bryan Mbeumo at 2.8 for Gameweek 2, against 2.2 for Iliman Ndiaye, a gap of 0.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Iliman Ndiaye has averaged 9.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Bryan Mbeumo is averaging 2.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Christos Tzolis leads on total points and the gap stands at 4. On attacking output, Christos Tzolis edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Antoine Semenyo has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Christos Tzolis has 0 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 25.9% for Antoine Semenyo and 25.4% for Christos Tzolis, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.9 expected points for Antoine Semenyo.

|

Priced at £7.5m and £8.5m, there is a £1.0m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Antoine Semenyo generates more points per million this season. Morgan Rogers at 0 against Antoine Semenyo at 0.2. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Antoine Semenyo the edge at 2.9 projected points. With ownership at 24.3% and 25.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Morgan Rogers at 2.6 for Gameweek 2, against 2.3 for Christos Tzolis, a gap of 0.3 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Christos Tzolis has averaged 6.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Morgan Rogers is averaging 0.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Gabriel leads on total points and the gap stands at 3. On attacking output, Issa Diop edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Issa Diop has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Gabriel has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 18.1% for Issa Diop and 29.6% for Gabriel, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 4.0 expected points for Gabriel.

|

Priced at £8.0m and £5.0m, there is a £3.0m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Gabriel generates more points per million this season. Gabriel at 0.6 against Harry Maguire at 0.2. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Gabriel the edge at 4.0 projected points. With ownership at 29.6% and 17.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Gabriel at 4.0 for Gameweek 2, against 2.8 for Marc Guéhi, a gap of 1.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Marc Guéhi has averaged 10.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Gabriel is averaging 5.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Iliman Ndiaye leads on total points and the gap stands at 7. On attacking output, Iliman Ndiaye edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Iliman Ndiaye has 0 goals and 1 assists this season; Antoine Semenyo has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 16% for Iliman Ndiaye and 25.9% for Antoine Semenyo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.9 expected points for Antoine Semenyo.

|

Priced at £6.5m and £6.5m, there is a £0.0m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Nico O'Reilly generates more points per million this season. Nico O'Reilly at 0.3 against Virgil at 0.3. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Nico O'Reilly the edge at 3.1 projected points. With ownership at 21.4% and 19.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Virgil at 3.1 for Gameweek 2, against 1.7 for Luke Shaw, a gap of 1.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Virgil has averaged 2.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Luke Shaw is averaging 1.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Issa Diop leads on total points and the gap stands at 0. On attacking output, Issa Diop edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Issa Diop has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Nico O'Reilly has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 18.1% for Issa Diop and 21.4% for Nico O'Reilly, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 3.1 expected points for Nico O'Reilly.

|

Priced at £4.5m and £6.5m, there is a £2.0m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Nico O'Reilly generates more points per million this season. Ezri Konsa at 0 against Nico O'Reilly at 0.3. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Nico O'Reilly the edge at 3.1 projected points. With ownership at 12.3% and 21.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Virgil at 3.1 for Gameweek 2, against 1.0 for Milan van Ewijk, a gap of 2.1 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Virgil has averaged 2.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Milan van Ewijk is averaging 1.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Virgil leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, Ezri Konsa edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Ezri Konsa has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Virgil has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 12.3% for Ezri Konsa and 19.5% for Virgil, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 3.1 expected points for Virgil.

|

Priced at £6.0m and £9.0m, there is a £3.0m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Brian Brobbey generates more points per million this season. Brian Brobbey at 0.3 against Alexander Isak at 0.2. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Alexander Isak the edge at 2.7 projected points. With ownership at 13.9% and 17% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Harry Maguire at 2.2 for Gameweek 2, against 1.7 for Ezri Konsa, a gap of 0.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Harry Maguire has averaged 1.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Ezri Konsa is averaging 0.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Alexander Isak leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, Alexander Isak edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Alexander Isak has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Jonah Kusi-Asare has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 17% for Alexander Isak and 7.4% for Jonah Kusi-Asare, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.7 expected points for Alexander Isak.

|

Priced at £7.5m and £4.5m, there is a £3.0m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Viktor Gyökeres generates more points per million this season. Viktor Gyökeres at 0 against Jonah Kusi-Asare at 0. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Viktor Gyökeres the edge at 2.4 projected points. With ownership at 8.4% and 7.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|