FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 2

Across the season, Bruno Fernandes leads on total points and the gap stands at 0. On attacking output, Bruno Fernandes edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Bruno Fernandes has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Bryan Mbeumo has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 50.8% for Bruno Fernandes and 37.8% for Bryan Mbeumo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 4.0 expected points for Bruno Fernandes.

|

Priced at £8.0m and £7.0m, there is a £1.0m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Dominik Szoboszlai generates more points per million this season. Bryan Mbeumo at 0.3 against Dominik Szoboszlai at 1.1. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Bryan Mbeumo the edge at 2.8 projected points. With ownership at 37.8% and 42% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Kai Havertz at 2.4 for Gameweek 2, against 2.4 for João Pedro, a gap of 0.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Kai Havertz has averaged 6.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while João Pedro is averaging 0.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Dominik Szoboszlai leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Dominik Szoboszlai edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Antoine Semenyo has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Dominik Szoboszlai has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 25.9% for Antoine Semenyo and 42% for Dominik Szoboszlai, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.9 expected points for Antoine Semenyo.

|

Priced at £7.5m and £7.0m, there is a £0.5m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Dominik Szoboszlai generates more points per million this season. Morgan Rogers at 0 against Dominik Szoboszlai at 1.1. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Morgan Rogers the edge at 2.6 projected points. With ownership at 24.3% and 42% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Bryan Mbeumo at 2.8 for Gameweek 2, against 2.3 for Christos Tzolis, a gap of 0.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Christos Tzolis has averaged 6.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Bryan Mbeumo is averaging 2.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Iliman Ndiaye leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Iliman Ndiaye edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Iliman Ndiaye has 0 goals and 1 assists this season; Dominik Szoboszlai has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 16% for Iliman Ndiaye and 42% for Dominik Szoboszlai, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.5 expected points for Dominik Szoboszlai.

|

Priced at £5.5m and £8.0m, there is a £2.5m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Pascal Groß at 0.4 against Bryan Mbeumo at 0.3. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Bryan Mbeumo the edge at 2.8 projected points. With ownership at 14% and 37.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Antoine Semenyo at 2.9 for Gameweek 2, against 2.3 for Christos Tzolis, a gap of 0.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Christos Tzolis has averaged 6.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Antoine Semenyo is averaging 2.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Declan Rice leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Declan Rice edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Declan Rice has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Antoine Semenyo has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 17.9% for Declan Rice and 25.9% for Antoine Semenyo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.9 expected points for Antoine Semenyo.

|

Priced at £7.5m and £6.5m, there is a £1.0m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Christos Tzolis generates more points per million this season. Declan Rice at 0.4 against Christos Tzolis at 0.9. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Declan Rice the edge at 2.6 projected points. With ownership at 17.9% and 25.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Declan Rice at 2.6 for Gameweek 2, against 2.6 for Morgan Rogers, a gap of 0.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Declan Rice has averaged 3.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Morgan Rogers is averaging 0.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Dominic Calvert-Lewin leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Dominic Calvert-Lewin edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Dominic Calvert-Lewin has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Ollie Watkins has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 30.5% for Dominic Calvert-Lewin and 10.1% for Ollie Watkins, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.5 expected points for Ollie Watkins.

|

Priced at £4.0m and £6.5m, there is a £2.5m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Issa Diop generates more points per million this season. Issa Diop at 0.5 against Nico O'Reilly at 0.3. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Nico O'Reilly the edge at 3.1 projected points. With ownership at 18.1% and 21.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Christos Tzolis at 2.3 for Gameweek 2, against 2.0 for Pascal Groß, a gap of 0.3 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Christos Tzolis has averaged 6.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Pascal Groß is averaging 2.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Marc Guéhi leads on total points and the gap stands at 8. On attacking output, Marc Guéhi edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Marc Guéhi has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Nico O'Reilly has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 17.6% for Marc Guéhi and 21.4% for Nico O'Reilly, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 3.1 expected points for Nico O'Reilly.

|

Priced at £6.0m and £4.5m, there is a £1.5m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Marc Guéhi generates more points per million this season. Marc Guéhi at 1.7 against Luke Shaw at 0.2. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Marc Guéhi the edge at 2.8 projected points. With ownership at 17.6% and 20.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Harry Maguire at 2.2 for Gameweek 2, against 1.0 for Issa Diop, a gap of 1.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Issa Diop has averaged 2.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Harry Maguire is averaging 1.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Luke Shaw leads on total points and the gap stands at 0. On attacking output, Luke Shaw edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Luke Shaw has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Milan van Ewijk has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 20.8% for Luke Shaw and 13.6% for Milan van Ewijk, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 1.7 expected points for Luke Shaw.

|

Priced at £4.0m and £6.5m, there is a £2.5m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Milan van Ewijk generates more points per million this season. Milan van Ewijk at 0.3 against Virgil at 0.3. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Virgil the edge at 3.1 projected points. With ownership at 13.6% and 19.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Declan Rice at 2.6 for Gameweek 2, against 2.0 for Pascal Groß, a gap of 0.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Declan Rice has averaged 3.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Pascal Groß is averaging 2.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Harry Maguire leads on total points and the gap stands at 0. On attacking output, Harry Maguire edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Harry Maguire has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Milan van Ewijk has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 17.9% for Harry Maguire and 13.6% for Milan van Ewijk, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.2 expected points for Harry Maguire.

|

Priced at £6.0m and £9.0m, there is a £3.0m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Brian Brobbey generates more points per million this season. Brian Brobbey at 0.3 against Alexander Isak at 0.2. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Alexander Isak the edge at 2.7 projected points. With ownership at 13.9% and 17% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Igor Thiago at 2.5 for Gameweek 2, against 1.0 for Jonah Kusi-Asare, a gap of 1.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Jonah Kusi-Asare has averaged 0.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Igor Thiago is averaging 0.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Kai Havertz leads on total points and the gap stands at 4. On attacking output, Kai Havertz edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Kai Havertz has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Alexander Isak has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 6.3% for Kai Havertz and 17% for Alexander Isak, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.7 expected points for Alexander Isak.

|