FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 6

Priced at £15.6m and £9.1m, there is a £6.5m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Alexander Isak generates more points per million this season. Erling Haaland at 2.1 against Alexander Isak at 2.7. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Erling Haaland the edge at 6.6 projected points. With ownership at 73.3% and 21.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Erling Haaland the clear short-term pick. Erling Haaland carries 6.6 expected points and 6.6 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Erling Haaland leads on total points and the gap stands at 26. On attacking output, Erling Haaland edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Brian Brobbey has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Erling Haaland has 4 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 5.4% for Brian Brobbey and 73.3% for Erling Haaland, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.6 expected points for Erling Haaland.

|

Priced at £5.8m and £6.1m, there is a £0.3m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Riccardo Calafiori generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 4.8 against James Tarkowski at 4.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives James Tarkowski the edge at 5.8 projected points. With ownership at 50.7% and 14.1% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Pascal Groß at 6.6 for Gameweek 6, against 5.8 for Morgan Rogers, a gap of 0.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Pascal Groß has averaged 6.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Morgan Rogers is averaging 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Morgan Rogers leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Morgan Rogers edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Bryan Mbeumo has 2 goals and 1 assists this season; Morgan Rogers has 3 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 21.5% for Bryan Mbeumo and 40% for Morgan Rogers, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.8 expected points for Morgan Rogers.

|

Priced at £12.0m and £7.9m, there is a £4.1m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Bryan Mbeumo generates more points per million this season. Bruno Fernandes at 2.4 against Bryan Mbeumo at 2.9. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Bruno Fernandes the edge at 5.8 projected points. With ownership at 39.9% and 21.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Bruno Fernandes at 5.8 for Gameweek 6, against 5.2 for Morgan Gibbs-White, a gap of 0.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Bruno Fernandes has averaged 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Morgan Gibbs-White is averaging 5.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Morgan Rogers leads on total points and the gap stands at 13. On attacking output, Morgan Rogers edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Morgan Rogers has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Antoine Semenyo has 0 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 40% for Morgan Rogers and 14.7% for Antoine Semenyo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.8 expected points for Morgan Rogers.

|

Priced at £8.0m and £5.7m, there is a £2.3m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Joško Gvardiol generates more points per million this season. Gabriel at 3 against Joško Gvardiol at 5.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Joško Gvardiol the edge at 6.6 projected points. With ownership at 23.1% and 25.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Maxim De Cuyper at 6.4 for Gameweek 6, against 4.8 for Gabriel, a gap of 1.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Maxim De Cuyper has averaged 6.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Gabriel is averaging 4.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Cole Palmer leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, Cole Palmer edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Morgan Gibbs-White has 1 goals and 2 assists this season; Cole Palmer has 2 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 16% for Morgan Gibbs-White and 27% for Cole Palmer, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.6 expected points for Cole Palmer.

|

Priced at £5.7m and £7.9m, there is a £2.2m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Pascal Groß at 5.8 against Bryan Mbeumo at 2.9. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Pascal Groß the edge at 6.6 projected points. With ownership at 21.5% and 21.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Rayan Cherki at 5.2 for Gameweek 6, against 3.2 for Antoine Semenyo, a gap of 2.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Rayan Cherki has averaged 5.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Antoine Semenyo is averaging 3.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Pascal Groß leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Pascal Groß edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Martin Ødegaard has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Pascal Groß has 2 goals and 3 assists. Ownership sits at 20.1% for Martin Ødegaard and 21.5% for Pascal Groß, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.6 expected points for Pascal Groß.

|

Priced at £8.0m and £5.2m, there is a £2.8m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Lewis Hall generates more points per million this season. Gabriel at 3 against Lewis Hall at 3.5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Gabriel the edge at 4.8 projected points. With ownership at 23.1% and 14.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Morgan Gibbs-White at 5.2 for Gameweek 6, against 4.6 for Bryan Mbeumo, a gap of 0.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Morgan Gibbs-White has averaged 5.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Bryan Mbeumo is averaging 4.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Lewis Hall leads on total points and the gap stands at 7. On attacking output, Lewis Hall edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Lewis Hall has 0 goals and 1 assists this season; Ezri Konsa has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 14.9% for Lewis Hall and 19.4% for Ezri Konsa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 3.6 expected points for Lewis Hall.

|

Priced at £6.0m and £6.1m, there is a £0.1m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, James Tarkowski generates more points per million this season. Marc Guéhi at 4.3 against James Tarkowski at 4.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives James Tarkowski the edge at 5.8 projected points. With ownership at 18.6% and 14.1% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Semi Ajayi at 5.2 for Gameweek 6, against 3.4 for Virgil, a gap of 1.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Semi Ajayi has averaged 5.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Virgil is averaging 3.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Yoane Wissa leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Yoane Wissa edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Thierno Barry has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Yoane Wissa has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 7.9% for Thierno Barry and 19.3% for Yoane Wissa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 3.0 expected points for Yoane Wissa.

|

Priced at £6.0m and £9.1m, there is a £3.1m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Alexander Isak generates more points per million this season. Gonzalo at 2 against Alexander Isak at 2.7. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Alexander Isak the edge at 5.0 projected points. With ownership at 3.7% and 21.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Yoane Wissa at 3.0 for Gameweek 6, against 1.4 for Brian Brobbey, a gap of 1.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Yoane Wissa has averaged 3.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Brian Brobbey is averaging 1.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Thierno Barry leads on total points and the gap stands at 4. On attacking output, Thierno Barry edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Thierno Barry has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Igor Thiago has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 7.9% for Thierno Barry and 8.9% for Igor Thiago, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 2.8 expected points for Thierno Barry.

|

Priced at £5.6m and £7.6m, there is a £2.0m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Thierno Barry generates more points per million this season. Thierno Barry at 2.5 against Kai Havertz at 2.2. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Kai Havertz the edge at 3.4 projected points. With ownership at 7.9% and 8.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|