Marco Palestra vs Milan van Ewijk: Gameweek 2 Analysis
| Photo | Player | GW xPts | Form | Season Pts | Goals | Assists | Pts per £m | Ownership | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | Palestra DEF - Chelsea | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3% | £5.5m |
 | van Ewijk DEF - Coventry City | 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 | 13.6% | £4.0m |
TOO CLOSE TO CALL
Marco Palestra and Milan van Ewijk are closely matched in Gameweek 2. Both carry similar expected returns, form, and fixture difficulty. This one comes down to your squad needs and risk tolerance.
- Marco Palestra projects 1.5 more expected points in GW2.
- Milan van Ewijk is in sharper form with 1.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks.
Fixture run - next 4 gameweeks
Palestra
GW2
Brighton
Home
GW3
Arsenal
Away
GW4
Hull City
Home
GW5
Brentford
Away
van Ewijk
GW2
Hull City
Home
GW3
Man City
Away
GW4
Brighton
Home
GW5
Nott'm Forest
Away
The case for each player
Palestra
- Marco Palestra has registered 0 goals and 0 assists this season, totalling 0 points at £5.5m.
- Expected to score 2.5 points in GW2, making Palestra a viable starting option.
- With only 3% ownership, Palestra offers differential value to boost your rank if they deliver.
van Ewijk
- Milan van Ewijk has registered 0 goals and 0 assists this season, totalling 1 points at £4.0m.
- Expected to score 1.0 points in GW2, making van Ewijk a viable starting option.
- van Ewijk has shown better recent form at 1.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks.
Palestra vs van Ewijk Gameweek 2
Click a question below and get the full breakdown.
CF
I've pulled the latest GW2 data for Marco Palestra and Milan van Ewijk. The verdict is below - click any question for more detail.
Ask a question
ChatFPL AI
Palestra has the better fixture run - but van Ewijk frees up £1.5m.
Ask ChatFPL AI how to spend that £1.5m saving on your specific squad.
Try ChatFPL AI for free