The expected points model has Erling Haaland at 6.6 for Gameweek 6, against 4.0 for Thierno Barry, a gap of 2.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Erling Haaland has averaged 6.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Thierno Barry is averaging 4.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Erling Haaland leads on total points and the gap stands at 26. On attacking output, Erling Haaland edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Brian Brobbey has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Erling Haaland has 4 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 5.3% for Brian Brobbey and 73.4% for Erling Haaland, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.6 expected points for Erling Haaland.
|


Priced at £5.8m and £6.1m, there is a £0.3m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, James Tarkowski generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 5 against James Tarkowski at 7. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives James Tarkowski the edge at 8.6 projected points. With ownership at 50.7% and 14.6% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Morgan Rogers at 5.8 for Gameweek 6, against 3.2 for Antoine Semenyo, a gap of 2.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Morgan Rogers has averaged 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Antoine Semenyo is averaging 3.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Cole Palmer leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, Rayan Cherki edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Rayan Cherki has 2 goals and 2 assists this season; Cole Palmer has 2 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 27.8% for Rayan Cherki and 26.8% for Cole Palmer, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.6 expected points for Cole Palmer.
|
Priced at £5.8m and £9.7m, there is a £3.9m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Pascal Groß at 8.1 against Cole Palmer at 2.9. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Pascal Groß the edge at 9.4 projected points. With ownership at 24.2% and 26.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Morgan Gibbs-White at 5.6 for Gameweek 6, against 3.6 for Dominik Szoboszlai, a gap of 2.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Morgan Gibbs-White has averaged 5.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Dominik Szoboszlai is averaging 3.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Rayan Cherki leads on total points and the gap stands at 3. On attacking output, Rayan Cherki edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Rayan Cherki has 2 goals and 2 assists this season; Bryan Mbeumo has 2 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 27.8% for Rayan Cherki and 21.3% for Bryan Mbeumo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.2 expected points for Rayan Cherki.
|


Priced at £8.4m and £7.0m, there is a £1.4m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Dominik Szoboszlai generates more points per million this season. Antoine Semenyo at 1.9 against Dominik Szoboszlai at 2.6. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Dominik Szoboszlai the edge at 3.6 projected points. With ownership at 14.6% and 34.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Martin Ødegaard at 5.8 for Gameweek 6, against 5.2 for Rayan Cherki, a gap of 0.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Martin Ødegaard has averaged 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Rayan Cherki is averaging 5.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Joško Gvardiol leads on total points and the gap stands at 7. On attacking output, Joško Gvardiol edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Marc Guéhi has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Joško Gvardiol has 1 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 18.5% for Marc Guéhi and 26.2% for Joško Gvardiol, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.6 expected points for Joško Gvardiol.
|
Priced at £9.1m and £6.2m, there is a £2.9m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Alexander Isak generates more points per million this season. Alexander Isak at 2.7 against Yoane Wissa at 2.4. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Alexander Isak the edge at 5.0 projected points. With ownership at 21.9% and 19.1% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Gabriel at 5.0 for Gameweek 6, against 3.4 for Virgil, a gap of 1.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Gabriel has averaged 5.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Virgil is averaging 3.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Lewis Hall leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Lewis Hall edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Gabriel has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Lewis Hall has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 23% for Gabriel and 15.4% for Lewis Hall, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.2 expected points for Lewis Hall.
|
Priced at £6.0m and £4.6m, there is a £1.4m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Marc Guéhi generates more points per million this season. Marc Guéhi at 4.3 against Ezri Konsa at 2.6. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Marc Guéhi the edge at 5.2 projected points. With ownership at 18.5% and 19.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Martin Ødegaard at 5.8 for Gameweek 6, against 3.2 for Antoine Semenyo, a gap of 2.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Martin Ødegaard has averaged 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Antoine Semenyo is averaging 3.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Thierno Barry leads on total points and the gap stands at 0. On attacking output, Dominic Calvert-Lewin edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Thierno Barry has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Dominic Calvert-Lewin has 2 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 8% for Thierno Barry and 25.7% for Dominic Calvert-Lewin, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 4.0 expected points for Thierno Barry.
|
Priced at £5.2m and £6.5m, there is a £1.3m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Lewis Hall generates more points per million this season. Lewis Hall at 6 against Virgil at 2.6. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Lewis Hall the edge at 6.2 projected points. With ownership at 15.4% and 16.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has James Tarkowski at 8.6 for Gameweek 6, against 3.4 for Virgil, a gap of 5.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: James Tarkowski has averaged 8.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Virgil is averaging 3.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Alexander Isak leads on total points and the gap stands at 5. On attacking output, Alexander Isak edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Thierno Barry has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Alexander Isak has 3 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 8% for Thierno Barry and 21.9% for Alexander Isak, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.0 expected points for Alexander Isak.
|
Priced at £4.2m and £5.2m, there is a £1.0m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Semi Ajayi generates more points per million this season. Semi Ajayi at 6.4 against Lewis Hall at 6. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Lewis Hall the edge at 6.2 projected points. With ownership at 14.2% and 15.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Thierno Barry at 4.0 for Gameweek 6, against 3.8 for Kai Havertz, a gap of 0.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Thierno Barry has averaged 4.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Kai Havertz is averaging 3.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Kai Havertz leads on total points and the gap stands at 12. On attacking output, Kai Havertz edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Brian Brobbey has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Kai Havertz has 2 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 5.3% for Brian Brobbey and 8.5% for Kai Havertz, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 3.8 expected points for Kai Havertz.
|
Priced at £6.0m and £7.6m, there is a £1.6m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Kai Havertz generates more points per million this season. Gonzalo at 2 against Kai Havertz at 2.5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Kai Havertz the edge at 3.8 projected points. With ownership at 3.7% and 8.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Gonzalo at 2.4 for Gameweek 6, against 1.4 for Brian Brobbey, a gap of 1.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Gonzalo has averaged 2.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Brian Brobbey is averaging 1.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
25 random matchups from the top 10 most-owned defenders, midfielders and forwards for GW6. Ranked by combined ownership. Excludes goalkeepers and ruled-out players. Refreshes each visit.













