Question 1

Who has the stronger DEFCON rate: Adams or Stach?

Accepted Answer

Adams is the stronger DEFCON profile at 11.44 actions per 90 against 9.99 for Stach - a gap of 1.45 per 90. Over a 38-match season that difference works out to roughly 55 extra defensive contribution actions before any attacking upside is factored in.

Question 2

How do the raw defensive workloads of Adams and Stach compare?

Accepted Answer

Adams has logged 37 combined clearances, blocks, interceptions and tackles across 637 minutes (5.2 per 90). Stach has logged 48 across 676 minutes (6.4 per 90). Adams earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 3 of 9 appearances this season; Stach earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 3 of 9 appearances this season. Higher raw counts reflect a higher defensive workload; higher per-90 rates reflect efficiency at sustaining that workload.

Question 3

Does the Gameweek 10 fixture change the DEFCON case?

Accepted Answer

Adams is away at Ipswich Town (FDR 2) and Stach is at home to Spurs (FDR 3) in Gameweek 10. DEFCON output is action-based rather than result-based, so a tough fixture does not shrink the base rate the way it might reduce a clean sheet probability. That said, both players are more likely to see defensive volume in tougher matches - the DEFCON case can actually be marginally stronger against stronger opposition.

Question 4

Which midfielder should I pick for Gameweek 10 on DEFCON grounds?

Accepted Answer

Adams has the DEFCON edge at 11.44 per 90 versus 9.99. That advantage costs £1.0m if Adams is dearer - work out whether the edge is worth the outlay in your specific squad. On DEFCON grounds alone Adams is the better profile, but £1.0m spent elsewhere may return more depending on where you are stretched.

Tyler Adams vs Anton Stach DEFCON: Fantasy Premier League Gameweek 10

Tyler Adams vs Anton Stach: DEFCON Analysis

Adams vs Stach Gameweek 10

Adams has the better DEFCON rate and is £1.0m cheaper - is it a no-brainer for your squad?