Question 1

Who has the stronger DEFCON rate: Affengruber or Milenković?

Accepted Answer

Affengruber is the stronger DEFCON profile at 12.00 actions per 90 against 10.33 for Milenković - a gap of 1.67 per 90. Over a 38-match season that difference works out to roughly 63 extra defensive contribution actions before any attacking upside is factored in.

Question 2

How do the raw defensive workloads of Affengruber and Milenković compare?

Accepted Answer

Affengruber has logged 12 combined clearances, blocks, interceptions and tackles across 90 minutes (12.0 per 90). Milenković has logged 31 across 270 minutes (10.3 per 90). Affengruber earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 1 of 1 appearances this season; Milenković earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 2 of 3 appearances this season. Higher raw counts reflect a higher defensive workload; higher per-90 rates reflect efficiency at sustaining that workload.

Question 3

Does the Gameweek 6 fixture change the DEFCON case?

Accepted Answer

Affengruber is away at Ipswich Town (FDR 2) and Milenković is away at Crystal Palace (FDR 3) in Gameweek 6. DEFCON output is action-based rather than result-based, so a tough fixture does not shrink the base rate the way it might reduce a clean sheet probability. That said, both players are more likely to see defensive volume in tougher matches - the DEFCON case can actually be marginally stronger against stronger opposition.

Question 4

Which defender should I pick for Gameweek 6 on DEFCON grounds?

Accepted Answer

Affengruber has the DEFCON edge at 12.00 per 90 versus 10.33. That advantage costs £0.9m if Affengruber is dearer - work out whether the edge is worth the outlay in your specific squad. On DEFCON grounds alone Affengruber is the better profile, but £0.9m spent elsewhere may return more depending on where you are stretched.

David Affengruber vs Nikola Milenković DEFCON: Fantasy Premier League Gameweek 6

David Affengruber vs Nikola Milenković: DEFCON Analysis

Affengruber vs Milenković Gameweek 6

Affengruber has the better DEFCON rate and is £0.9m cheaper - is it a no-brainer for your squad?