Question 1

Who has the stronger DEFCON rate: Bijol or Milenković?

Accepted Answer

Bijol is the stronger DEFCON profile at 11.52 actions per 90 against 10.33 for Milenković - a gap of 1.19 per 90. Over a 38-match season that difference works out to roughly 45 extra defensive contribution actions before any attacking upside is factored in.

Question 2

How do the raw defensive workloads of Bijol and Milenković compare?

Accepted Answer

Bijol has logged 21 combined clearances, blocks, interceptions and tackles across 164 minutes (11.5 per 90). Milenković has logged 31 across 270 minutes (10.3 per 90). Bijol earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 1 of 3 appearances this season; Milenković earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 2 of 3 appearances this season. Higher raw counts reflect a higher defensive workload; higher per-90 rates reflect efficiency at sustaining that workload.

Question 3

Does the Gameweek 6 fixture change the DEFCON case?

Accepted Answer

Bijol is away at Arsenal (FDR 5) and Milenković is away at Crystal Palace (FDR 3) in Gameweek 6. DEFCON output is action-based rather than result-based, so a tough fixture does not shrink the base rate the way it might reduce a clean sheet probability. That said, both players are more likely to see defensive volume in tougher matches - the DEFCON case can actually be marginally stronger against stronger opposition.

Question 4

Which defender should I pick for Gameweek 6 on DEFCON grounds?

Accepted Answer

Bijol has the DEFCON edge at 11.52 per 90 versus 10.33. That advantage costs £0.4m if Bijol is dearer - work out whether the edge is worth the outlay in your specific squad. On DEFCON grounds alone Bijol is the better profile, but £0.4m spent elsewhere may return more depending on where you are stretched.

Jaka Bijol vs Nikola Milenković DEFCON: Fantasy Premier League Gameweek 6

Jaka Bijol vs Nikola Milenković: DEFCON Analysis

Bijol vs Milenković Gameweek 6

Bijol has the better DEFCON rate and is £0.4m cheaper - is it a no-brainer for your squad?