Question 1

Who has the stronger DEFCON rate: Botman or Lacroix?

Accepted Answer

Barely anything in it. Botman averages 11.29 defensive contribution actions per 90 and Lacroix averages 10.36 - a gap of 0.93 that is inside the natural noise of any per-90 metric. On the workload alone this is a coin toss and the decision should rest on fixture, price and attacking output rather than DEFCON.

Question 2

How do the raw defensive workloads of Botman and Lacroix compare?

Accepted Answer

Botman has logged 79 combined clearances, blocks, interceptions and tackles across 630 minutes (11.3 per 90). Lacroix has logged 73 across 634 minutes (10.4 per 90). Botman earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 5 of 7 appearances this season; Lacroix earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 4 of 8 appearances this season. Higher raw counts reflect a higher defensive workload; higher per-90 rates reflect efficiency at sustaining that workload.

Question 3

Does the Gameweek 10 fixture change the DEFCON case?

Accepted Answer

Botman is away at Fulham (FDR 3) and Lacroix is away at Sunderland (FDR 3) in Gameweek 10. DEFCON output is action-based rather than result-based, so a tough fixture does not shrink the base rate the way it might reduce a clean sheet probability. That said, both players are more likely to see defensive volume in tougher matches - the DEFCON case can actually be marginally stronger against stronger opposition.

Question 4

Which defender should I pick for Gameweek 10 on DEFCON grounds?

Accepted Answer

The DEFCON workloads are too close to call. Both Botman and Lacroix deliver similar defensive contribution rates, so the pick should come down to price, fixtures and attacking output rather than DEFCON. On the defensive contributions alone this is a genuine coin toss.

Sven Botman vs Maxence Lacroix DEFCON: Fantasy Premier League Gameweek 10

Sven Botman vs Maxence Lacroix: DEFCON Analysis

Botman vs Lacroix Gameweek 10

Botman has the better DEFCON rate and is £0.9m cheaper - is it a no-brainer for your squad?