Question 1

Who has the stronger DEFCON rate: Diomande or Egan?

Accepted Answer

Barely anything in it. Diomande averages 13.85 defensive contribution actions per 90 and Egan averages 13.75 - a gap of 0.10 that is inside the natural noise of any per-90 metric. On the workload alone this is a coin toss and the decision should rest on fixture, price and attacking output rather than DEFCON.

Question 2

How do the raw defensive workloads of Diomande and Egan compare?

Accepted Answer

Diomande has logged 14 combined clearances, blocks, interceptions and tackles across 91 minutes (13.8 per 90). Egan has logged 55 across 360 minutes (13.8 per 90). Diomande earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 1 of 2 appearances this season; Egan earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 3 of 4 appearances this season. Higher raw counts reflect a higher defensive workload; higher per-90 rates reflect efficiency at sustaining that workload.

Question 3

Does the Gameweek 6 fixture change the DEFCON case?

Accepted Answer

Diomande is away at Crystal Palace (FDR 3) and Egan is at home to Everton (FDR 3) in Gameweek 6. DEFCON output is action-based rather than result-based, so a tough fixture does not shrink the base rate the way it might reduce a clean sheet probability. That said, both players are more likely to see defensive volume in tougher matches - the DEFCON case can actually be marginally stronger against stronger opposition.

Question 4

Which defender should I pick for Gameweek 6 on DEFCON grounds?

Accepted Answer

The DEFCON workloads are too close to call. Both Diomande and Egan deliver similar defensive contribution rates, so the pick should come down to price, fixtures and attacking output rather than DEFCON. On the defensive contributions alone this is a genuine coin toss.

Ousmane Diomande vs John Egan DEFCON: Fantasy Premier League Gameweek 6

Ousmane Diomande vs John Egan: DEFCON Analysis

Diomande vs Egan Gameweek 6

Diomande has the DEFCON edge but costs £1.3m more than Egan. Where should the money go?