Season is early - both DEFCON rates reflect a small sample and will settle from Gameweek 7 or 8 onwards.

Diomande
DEF · £5.4m
13.85
DC/90
14
DC
14
CBIT
Bonus at 10+ CBIT
vs

Wan-Bissaka
DEF · £4.5m
12.62
DC/90
15
DC
15
CBIT
Bonus at 10+ CBIT
Ousmane Diomande vs Aaron Wan-Bissaka: DEFCON Analysis
| Photo | Player | DC/90 | DC | CBIT | Minutes | Season Pts | GW xPts | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | Diomande DEF - Nott'm Forest | 13.85 | 14 | 14 | 91 | 5 | 1.0 | £5.4m |
![]() | Wan-Bissaka DEF - Aston Villa | 12.62 | 15 | 15 | 107 | 5 | 1.2 | £4.5m |
Diomande Edges DEFCON
Diomande has the stronger DEFCON profile of the two.
- Diomande: 13.85 defensive contribution actions per 90 across 91 minutes (14 total actions).
- Wan-Bissaka: 12.62 defensive contribution actions per 90 across 107 minutes (15 total actions).
- Wan-Bissaka is £0.9m cheaper.
Diomande vs Wan-Bissaka Gameweek 6
Click a question below and get the full breakdown.
CF
I've pulled the DEFCON data for Ousmane Diomande and Aaron Wan-Bissaka in Gameweek 6. Click any question below for the full breakdown.
Ask a question
ChatFPL AI
Diomande has the DEFCON edge but costs £0.9m more than Wan-Bissaka. Where should the money go?
ChatFPL AI factors in your specific squad, chip strategy and remaining budget before recommending.
Try ChatFPL AI Free
