Question 1

Who has the stronger DEFCON rate: Egan or Botman?

Accepted Answer

Egan is the stronger DEFCON profile at 13.75 actions per 90 against 10.25 for Botman - a gap of 3.50 per 90. Over a 38-match season that difference works out to roughly 133 extra defensive contribution actions before any attacking upside is factored in.

Question 2

How do the raw defensive workloads of Egan and Botman compare?

Accepted Answer

Egan has logged 55 combined clearances, blocks, interceptions and tackles across 360 minutes (13.8 per 90). Botman has logged 41 across 360 minutes (10.3 per 90). Egan earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 3 of 4 appearances this season; Botman earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 2 of 4 appearances this season. Higher raw counts reflect a higher defensive workload; higher per-90 rates reflect efficiency at sustaining that workload.

Question 3

Does the Gameweek 6 fixture change the DEFCON case?

Accepted Answer

Egan is at home to Everton (FDR 3) and Botman is away at Coventry City (FDR 2) in Gameweek 6. DEFCON output is action-based rather than result-based, so a tough fixture does not shrink the base rate the way it might reduce a clean sheet probability. That said, both players are more likely to see defensive volume in tougher matches - the DEFCON case can actually be marginally stronger against stronger opposition.

Question 4

Which defender should I pick for Gameweek 6 on DEFCON grounds?

Accepted Answer

Egan has the DEFCON edge at 13.75 per 90 versus 10.25. That advantage costs £0.9m if Egan is dearer - work out whether the edge is worth the outlay in your specific squad. On DEFCON grounds alone Egan is the better profile, but £0.9m spent elsewhere may return more depending on where you are stretched.

John Egan vs Sven Botman DEFCON: Fantasy Premier League Gameweek 6

John Egan vs Sven Botman: DEFCON Analysis

Egan vs Botman Gameweek 6

Egan has the better DEFCON rate and is £0.9m cheaper - is it a no-brainer for your squad?