Question 1

Who has the stronger DEFCON rate: Egan or Mukiele?

Accepted Answer

Mukiele is the stronger DEFCON profile at 12.18 actions per 90 against 11.13 for Egan - a gap of 1.05 per 90. Over a 38-match season that difference works out to roughly 40 extra defensive contribution actions before any attacking upside is factored in.

Question 2

How do the raw defensive workloads of Egan and Mukiele compare?

Accepted Answer

Egan has logged 93 combined clearances, blocks, interceptions and tackles across 752 minutes (11.1 per 90). Mukiele has logged 80 across 591 minutes (12.2 per 90). Egan earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 5 of 9 appearances this season; Mukiele earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 4 of 7 appearances this season. Higher raw counts reflect a higher defensive workload; higher per-90 rates reflect efficiency at sustaining that workload.

Question 3

Does the Gameweek 10 fixture change the DEFCON case?

Accepted Answer

Egan is away at Arsenal (FDR 5) and Mukiele is at home to Chelsea (FDR 4) in Gameweek 10. DEFCON output is action-based rather than result-based, so a tough fixture does not shrink the base rate the way it might reduce a clean sheet probability. That said, both players are more likely to see defensive volume in tougher matches - the DEFCON case can actually be marginally stronger against stronger opposition.

Question 4

Which defender should I pick for Gameweek 10 on DEFCON grounds?

Accepted Answer

Mukiele has the DEFCON edge at 12.18 per 90 versus 11.13. That advantage costs £1.3m if Mukiele is dearer - work out whether the edge is worth the outlay in your specific squad. On DEFCON grounds alone Mukiele is the better profile, but £1.3m spent elsewhere may return more depending on where you are stretched.

John Egan vs Nordi Mukiele DEFCON: Fantasy Premier League Gameweek 10

John Egan vs Nordi Mukiele: DEFCON Analysis

Egan vs Mukiele Gameweek 10

Mukiele has the DEFCON edge but costs £1.3m more than Egan. Where should the money go?