Question 1

Who has the stronger DEFCON rate: Fofana or Egan?

Accepted Answer

Fofana is the stronger DEFCON profile at 13.56 actions per 90 against 12.15 for Egan - a gap of 1.41 per 90. Over a 38-match season that difference works out to roughly 54 extra defensive contribution actions before any attacking upside is factored in.

Question 2

How do the raw defensive workloads of Fofana and Egan compare?

Accepted Answer

Fofana has logged 47 combined clearances, blocks, interceptions and tackles across 312 minutes (13.6 per 90). Egan has logged 59 across 437 minutes (12.2 per 90). Fofana earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 2 of 4 appearances this season; Egan earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 3 of 5 appearances this season. Higher raw counts reflect a higher defensive workload; higher per-90 rates reflect efficiency at sustaining that workload.

Question 3

Does the Gameweek 6 fixture change the DEFCON case?

Accepted Answer

Fofana is at home to Bournemouth (FDR 3) and Egan is at home to Everton (FDR 3) in Gameweek 6. DEFCON output is action-based rather than result-based, so a tough fixture does not shrink the base rate the way it might reduce a clean sheet probability. That said, both players are more likely to see defensive volume in tougher matches - the DEFCON case can actually be marginally stronger against stronger opposition.

Question 4

Which defender should I pick for Gameweek 6 on DEFCON grounds?

Accepted Answer

Fofana has the DEFCON edge at 13.56 per 90 versus 12.15. That advantage costs £0.9m if Fofana is dearer - work out whether the edge is worth the outlay in your specific squad. On DEFCON grounds alone Fofana is the better profile, but £0.9m spent elsewhere may return more depending on where you are stretched.

Wesley Fofana vs John Egan DEFCON: Fantasy Premier League Gameweek 6

Wesley Fofana vs John Egan: DEFCON Analysis

Fofana vs Egan Gameweek 6

Fofana has the DEFCON edge but costs £0.9m more than Egan. Where should the money go?