Question 1

Who has the stronger DEFCON rate: Garner or Ampadu?

Accepted Answer

Garner is the stronger DEFCON profile at 13.61 actions per 90 against 11.50 for Ampadu - a gap of 2.11 per 90. Over a 38-match season that difference works out to roughly 80 extra defensive contribution actions before any attacking upside is factored in.

Question 2

How do the raw defensive workloads of Garner and Ampadu compare?

Accepted Answer

Garner has logged 16 combined clearances, blocks, interceptions and tackles across 238 minutes (6.1 per 90). Ampadu has logged 28 across 360 minutes (7.0 per 90). Garner earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 1 of 4 appearances this season; Ampadu earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 2 of 4 appearances this season. Higher raw counts reflect a higher defensive workload; higher per-90 rates reflect efficiency at sustaining that workload.

Question 3

Does the Gameweek 6 fixture change the DEFCON case?

Accepted Answer

Garner is away at Hull City (FDR 2) and Ampadu is away at Arsenal (FDR 5) in Gameweek 6. DEFCON output is action-based rather than result-based, so a tough fixture does not shrink the base rate the way it might reduce a clean sheet probability. That said, both players are more likely to see defensive volume in tougher matches - the DEFCON case can actually be marginally stronger against stronger opposition.

Question 4

Which midfielder should I pick for Gameweek 6 on DEFCON grounds?

Accepted Answer

Garner has the DEFCON edge at 13.61 per 90 versus 11.50. That advantage costs £0.6m if Garner is dearer - work out whether the edge is worth the outlay in your specific squad. On DEFCON grounds alone Garner is the better profile, but £0.6m spent elsewhere may return more depending on where you are stretched.

James Garner vs Ethan Ampadu DEFCON: Fantasy Premier League Gameweek 6

James Garner vs Ethan Ampadu: DEFCON Analysis

Garner vs Ampadu Gameweek 6

Garner has the DEFCON edge but costs £0.6m more than Ampadu. Where should the money go?