Question 1

Who has the stronger DEFCON rate: Muharemović or Ballard?

Accepted Answer

Muharemović is the stronger DEFCON profile at 10.89 actions per 90 against 9.80 for Ballard - a gap of 1.09 per 90. Over a 38-match season that difference works out to roughly 41 extra defensive contribution actions before any attacking upside is factored in.

Question 2

How do the raw defensive workloads of Muharemović and Ballard compare?

Accepted Answer

Muharemović has logged 98 combined clearances, blocks, interceptions and tackles across 810 minutes (10.9 per 90). Ballard has logged 49 across 450 minutes (9.8 per 90). Muharemović earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 6 of 9 appearances this season; Ballard earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 3 of 5 appearances this season. Higher raw counts reflect a higher defensive workload; higher per-90 rates reflect efficiency at sustaining that workload.

Question 3

Does the Gameweek 10 fixture change the DEFCON case?

Accepted Answer

Muharemović is at home to Spurs (FDR 3) and Ballard is at home to Chelsea (FDR 4) in Gameweek 10. DEFCON output is action-based rather than result-based, so a tough fixture does not shrink the base rate the way it might reduce a clean sheet probability. That said, both players are more likely to see defensive volume in tougher matches - the DEFCON case can actually be marginally stronger against stronger opposition.

Question 4

Which defender should I pick for Gameweek 10 on DEFCON grounds?

Accepted Answer

Muharemović has the DEFCON edge at 10.89 per 90 versus 9.80. That advantage costs £0.4m if Muharemović is dearer - work out whether the edge is worth the outlay in your specific squad. On DEFCON grounds alone Muharemović is the better profile, but £0.4m spent elsewhere may return more depending on where you are stretched.

Tarik Muharemović vs Daniel Ballard DEFCON: Fantasy Premier League Gameweek 10

Tarik Muharemović vs Daniel Ballard: DEFCON Analysis

Muharemović vs Ballard Gameweek 10

Muharemović has the DEFCON edge but costs £0.4m more than Ballard. Where should the money go?