Question 1

Who has the stronger DEFCON rate: Núñez or Ampadu?

Accepted Answer

Núñez is the stronger DEFCON profile at 13.50 actions per 90 against 11.50 for Ampadu - a gap of 2.00 per 90. Over a 38-match season that difference works out to roughly 76 extra defensive contribution actions before any attacking upside is factored in.

Question 2

How do the raw defensive workloads of Núñez and Ampadu compare?

Accepted Answer

Núñez has logged 11 combined clearances, blocks, interceptions and tackles across 140 minutes (7.1 per 90). Ampadu has logged 28 across 360 minutes (7.0 per 90). Núñez earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 1 of 2 appearances this season; Ampadu earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 2 of 4 appearances this season. Higher raw counts reflect a higher defensive workload; higher per-90 rates reflect efficiency at sustaining that workload.

Question 3

Does the Gameweek 6 fixture change the DEFCON case?

Accepted Answer

Núñez is at home to Fulham (FDR 2) and Ampadu is away at Arsenal (FDR 5) in Gameweek 6. DEFCON output is action-based rather than result-based, so a tough fixture does not shrink the base rate the way it might reduce a clean sheet probability. That said, both players are more likely to see defensive volume in tougher matches - the DEFCON case can actually be marginally stronger against stronger opposition.

Question 4

Which midfielder should I pick for Gameweek 6 on DEFCON grounds?

Accepted Answer

Núñez has the DEFCON edge at 13.50 per 90 versus 11.50. That advantage costs £0.5m if Núñez is dearer - work out whether the edge is worth the outlay in your specific squad. On DEFCON grounds alone Núñez is the better profile, but £0.5m spent elsewhere may return more depending on where you are stretched.

Marcelino Núñez vs Ethan Ampadu DEFCON: Fantasy Premier League Gameweek 6

Marcelino Núñez vs Ethan Ampadu: DEFCON Analysis

Núñez vs Ampadu Gameweek 6

Núñez has the better DEFCON rate and is £0.5m cheaper - is it a no-brainer for your squad?