Question 1

Who has the stronger DEFCON rate: O.Dango or Scott?

Accepted Answer

Barely anything in it. O.Dango averages 14.08 defensive contribution actions per 90 and Scott averages 13.15 - a gap of 0.93 that is inside the natural noise of any per-90 metric. On the workload alone this is a coin toss and the decision should rest on fixture, price and attacking output rather than DEFCON.

Question 2

How do the raw defensive workloads of O.Dango and Scott compare?

Accepted Answer

O.Dango has logged 11 combined clearances, blocks, interceptions and tackles across 179 minutes (5.5 per 90). Scott has logged 24 across 356 minutes (6.1 per 90). O.Dango earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 0 of 5 appearances this season; Scott earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 2 of 4 appearances this season. Higher raw counts reflect a higher defensive workload; higher per-90 rates reflect efficiency at sustaining that workload.

Question 3

Does the Gameweek 6 fixture change the DEFCON case?

Accepted Answer

O.Dango is away at Aston Villa (FDR 4) and Scott is away at Chelsea (FDR 4) in Gameweek 6. DEFCON output is action-based rather than result-based, so a tough fixture does not shrink the base rate the way it might reduce a clean sheet probability. That said, both players are more likely to see defensive volume in tougher matches - the DEFCON case can actually be marginally stronger against stronger opposition.

Question 4

Which midfielder should I pick for Gameweek 6 on DEFCON grounds?

Accepted Answer

The DEFCON workloads are too close to call. Both O.Dango and Scott deliver similar defensive contribution rates, so the pick should come down to price, fixtures and attacking output rather than DEFCON. On the defensive contributions alone this is a genuine coin toss.

Dango Dango vs Alex Scott DEFCON: Fantasy Premier League Gameweek 6

Dango Dango vs Alex Scott: DEFCON Analysis

O.Dango vs Scott Gameweek 6

O.Dango has the DEFCON edge but costs £0.2m more than Scott. Where should the money go?