Question 1

Who has the stronger DEFCON rate: O'Shea or Khalaili?

Accepted Answer

Barely anything in it. O'Shea averages 9.67 defensive contribution actions per 90 and Khalaili averages 9.54 - a gap of 0.13 that is inside the natural noise of any per-90 metric. On the workload alone this is a coin toss and the decision should rest on fixture, price and attacking output rather than DEFCON.

Question 2

How do the raw defensive workloads of O'Shea and Khalaili compare?

Accepted Answer

O'Shea has logged 87 combined clearances, blocks, interceptions and tackles across 810 minutes (9.7 per 90). Khalaili has logged 72 across 679 minutes (9.5 per 90). O'Shea earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 3 of 9 appearances this season; Khalaili earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 2 of 9 appearances this season. Higher raw counts reflect a higher defensive workload; higher per-90 rates reflect efficiency at sustaining that workload.

Question 3

Does the Gameweek 10 fixture change the DEFCON case?

Accepted Answer

O'Shea is at home to Bournemouth (FDR 3) and Khalaili is at home to Liverpool (FDR 4) in Gameweek 10. DEFCON output is action-based rather than result-based, so a tough fixture does not shrink the base rate the way it might reduce a clean sheet probability. That said, both players are more likely to see defensive volume in tougher matches - the DEFCON case can actually be marginally stronger against stronger opposition.

Question 4

Which defender should I pick for Gameweek 10 on DEFCON grounds?

Accepted Answer

The DEFCON workloads are too close to call. Both O'Shea and Khalaili deliver similar defensive contribution rates, so the pick should come down to price, fixtures and attacking output rather than DEFCON. On the defensive contributions alone this is a genuine coin toss.

Dara O'Shea vs Anan Khalaili DEFCON: Fantasy Premier League Gameweek 10

Dara O'Shea vs Anan Khalaili: DEFCON Analysis

O'Shea vs Khalaili Gameweek 10

O'Shea has the better DEFCON rate and is £1.0m cheaper - is it a no-brainer for your squad?