Question 1

Who has the stronger DEFCON rate: Pinnock or Muharemović?

Accepted Answer

Pinnock is the stronger DEFCON profile at 14.04 actions per 90 against 12.22 for Muharemović - a gap of 1.82 per 90. Over a 38-match season that difference works out to roughly 69 extra defensive contribution actions before any attacking upside is factored in.

Question 2

How do the raw defensive workloads of Pinnock and Muharemović compare?

Accepted Answer

Pinnock has logged 44 combined clearances, blocks, interceptions and tackles across 282 minutes (14.0 per 90). Muharemović has logged 55 across 405 minutes (12.2 per 90). Pinnock earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 3 of 4 appearances this season; Muharemović earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 3 of 5 appearances this season. Higher raw counts reflect a higher defensive workload; higher per-90 rates reflect efficiency at sustaining that workload.

Question 3

Does the Gameweek 6 fixture change the DEFCON case?

Accepted Answer

Pinnock is at home to Newcastle (FDR 2) and Muharemović is away at Arsenal (FDR 5) in Gameweek 6. DEFCON output is action-based rather than result-based, so a tough fixture does not shrink the base rate the way it might reduce a clean sheet probability. That said, both players are more likely to see defensive volume in tougher matches - the DEFCON case can actually be marginally stronger against stronger opposition.

Question 4

Which defender should I pick for Gameweek 6 on DEFCON grounds?

Accepted Answer

Pinnock has the DEFCON edge at 14.04 per 90 versus 12.22. That advantage costs £0.5m if Pinnock is dearer - work out whether the edge is worth the outlay in your specific squad. On DEFCON grounds alone Pinnock is the better profile, but £0.5m spent elsewhere may return more depending on where you are stretched.

Ethan Pinnock vs Tarik Muharemović DEFCON: Fantasy Premier League Gameweek 6

Ethan Pinnock vs Tarik Muharemović: DEFCON Analysis

Pinnock vs Muharemović Gameweek 6

Pinnock has the better DEFCON rate and is £0.5m cheaper - is it a no-brainer for your squad?