Question 1

Who has the stronger DEFCON rate: Richards or Muharemović?

Accepted Answer

Barely anything in it. Richards averages 11.67 defensive contribution actions per 90 and Muharemović averages 10.89 - a gap of 0.78 that is inside the natural noise of any per-90 metric. On the workload alone this is a coin toss and the decision should rest on fixture, price and attacking output rather than DEFCON.

Question 2

How do the raw defensive workloads of Richards and Muharemović compare?

Accepted Answer

Richards has logged 105 combined clearances, blocks, interceptions and tackles across 810 minutes (11.7 per 90). Muharemović has logged 98 across 810 minutes (10.9 per 90). Richards earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 7 of 9 appearances this season; Muharemović earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 6 of 9 appearances this season. Higher raw counts reflect a higher defensive workload; higher per-90 rates reflect efficiency at sustaining that workload.

Question 3

Does the Gameweek 10 fixture change the DEFCON case?

Accepted Answer

Richards is at home to Liverpool (FDR 4) and Muharemović is at home to Spurs (FDR 3) in Gameweek 10. DEFCON output is action-based rather than result-based, so a tough fixture does not shrink the base rate the way it might reduce a clean sheet probability. That said, both players are more likely to see defensive volume in tougher matches - the DEFCON case can actually be marginally stronger against stronger opposition.

Question 4

Which defender should I pick for Gameweek 10 on DEFCON grounds?

Accepted Answer

The DEFCON workloads are too close to call. Both Richards and Muharemović deliver similar defensive contribution rates, so the pick should come down to price, fixtures and attacking output rather than DEFCON. On the defensive contributions alone this is a genuine coin toss.

Chris Richards vs Tarik Muharemović DEFCON: Fantasy Premier League Gameweek 10

Chris Richards vs Tarik Muharemović: DEFCON Analysis

Richards vs Muharemović Gameweek 10

Richards has the better DEFCON rate and is £0.2m cheaper - is it a no-brainer for your squad?