Question 1

Who has the stronger DEFCON rate: Schuster or Affengruber?

Accepted Answer

Schuster is the stronger DEFCON profile at 13.52 actions per 90 against 12.00 for Affengruber - a gap of 1.52 per 90. Over a 38-match season that difference works out to roughly 58 extra defensive contribution actions before any attacking upside is factored in.

Question 2

How do the raw defensive workloads of Schuster and Affengruber compare?

Accepted Answer

Schuster has logged 38 combined clearances, blocks, interceptions and tackles across 253 minutes (13.5 per 90). Affengruber has logged 12 across 90 minutes (12.0 per 90). Schuster earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 3 of 3 appearances this season; Affengruber earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 1 of 1 appearances this season. Higher raw counts reflect a higher defensive workload; higher per-90 rates reflect efficiency at sustaining that workload.

Question 3

Does the Gameweek 6 fixture change the DEFCON case?

Accepted Answer

Schuster is away at Aston Villa (FDR 4) and Affengruber is away at Ipswich Town (FDR 2) in Gameweek 6. DEFCON output is action-based rather than result-based, so a tough fixture does not shrink the base rate the way it might reduce a clean sheet probability. That said, both players are more likely to see defensive volume in tougher matches - the DEFCON case can actually be marginally stronger against stronger opposition.

Question 4

Which defender should I pick for Gameweek 6 on DEFCON grounds?

Accepted Answer

At near-identical prices, Schuster is the cleaner DEFCON pick. The 1.52 per 90 edge is meaningful over the run of the season, and with no price advantage for Affengruber the choice tips to Schuster for managers building around defensive contributions.

Jannik Schuster vs David Affengruber DEFCON: Fantasy Premier League Gameweek 6

Jannik Schuster vs David Affengruber: DEFCON Analysis

Schuster vs Affengruber Gameweek 6

Schuster has the DEFCON edge at a similar price. Would he fit your specific squad?