Question 1

Who has the stronger DEFCON rate: Scott or Ampadu?

Accepted Answer

Scott is the stronger DEFCON profile at 13.15 actions per 90 against 11.50 for Ampadu - a gap of 1.65 per 90. Over a 38-match season that difference works out to roughly 63 extra defensive contribution actions before any attacking upside is factored in.

Question 2

How do the raw defensive workloads of Scott and Ampadu compare?

Accepted Answer

Scott has logged 24 combined clearances, blocks, interceptions and tackles across 356 minutes (6.1 per 90). Ampadu has logged 28 across 360 minutes (7.0 per 90). Scott earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 2 of 4 appearances this season; Ampadu earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 2 of 4 appearances this season. Higher raw counts reflect a higher defensive workload; higher per-90 rates reflect efficiency at sustaining that workload.

Question 3

Does the Gameweek 6 fixture change the DEFCON case?

Accepted Answer

Scott is away at Chelsea (FDR 4) and Ampadu is away at Arsenal (FDR 5) in Gameweek 6. DEFCON output is action-based rather than result-based, so a tough fixture does not shrink the base rate the way it might reduce a clean sheet probability. That said, both players are more likely to see defensive volume in tougher matches - the DEFCON case can actually be marginally stronger against stronger opposition.

Question 4

Which midfielder should I pick for Gameweek 6 on DEFCON grounds?

Accepted Answer

Scott has the DEFCON edge at 13.15 per 90 versus 11.50. That advantage costs £0.7m if Scott is dearer - work out whether the edge is worth the outlay in your specific squad. On DEFCON grounds alone Scott is the better profile, but £0.7m spent elsewhere may return more depending on where you are stretched.

Alex Scott vs Ethan Ampadu DEFCON: Fantasy Premier League Gameweek 6

Alex Scott vs Ethan Ampadu: DEFCON Analysis

Scott vs Ampadu Gameweek 6

Scott has the DEFCON edge but costs £0.7m more than Ampadu. Where should the money go?