Question 1

Who has the stronger DEFCON rate: Scott or Janelt?

Accepted Answer

Barely anything in it. Scott averages 13.15 defensive contribution actions per 90 and Janelt averages 12.80 - a gap of 0.35 that is inside the natural noise of any per-90 metric. On the workload alone this is a coin toss and the decision should rest on fixture, price and attacking output rather than DEFCON.

Question 2

How do the raw defensive workloads of Scott and Janelt compare?

Accepted Answer

Scott has logged 24 combined clearances, blocks, interceptions and tackles across 356 minutes (6.1 per 90). Janelt has logged 44 across 450 minutes (8.8 per 90). Scott earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 2 of 4 appearances this season; Janelt earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 3 of 5 appearances this season. Higher raw counts reflect a higher defensive workload; higher per-90 rates reflect efficiency at sustaining that workload.

Question 3

Does the Gameweek 6 fixture change the DEFCON case?

Accepted Answer

Scott is away at Chelsea (FDR 4) and Janelt is away at Aston Villa (FDR 4) in Gameweek 6. DEFCON output is action-based rather than result-based, so a tough fixture does not shrink the base rate the way it might reduce a clean sheet probability. That said, both players are more likely to see defensive volume in tougher matches - the DEFCON case can actually be marginally stronger against stronger opposition.

Question 4

Which midfielder should I pick for Gameweek 6 on DEFCON grounds?

Accepted Answer

The DEFCON workloads are too close to call. Both Scott and Janelt deliver similar defensive contribution rates, so the pick should come down to price, fixtures and attacking output rather than DEFCON. On the defensive contributions alone this is a genuine coin toss.

Alex Scott vs Vitaly Janelt DEFCON: Fantasy Premier League Gameweek 6

Alex Scott vs Vitaly Janelt: DEFCON Analysis

Scott vs Janelt Gameweek 6

Scott has the DEFCON edge but costs £1.1m more than Janelt. Where should the money go?