Question 1

Who has the stronger DEFCON rate: Senesi or Wan-Bissaka?

Accepted Answer

Senesi is the stronger DEFCON profile at 16.00 actions per 90 against 12.62 for Wan-Bissaka - a gap of 3.38 per 90. Over a 38-match season that difference works out to roughly 128 extra defensive contribution actions before any attacking upside is factored in.

Question 2

How do the raw defensive workloads of Senesi and Wan-Bissaka compare?

Accepted Answer

Senesi has logged 16 combined clearances, blocks, interceptions and tackles across 90 minutes (16.0 per 90). Wan-Bissaka has logged 15 across 107 minutes (12.6 per 90). Senesi earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 1 of 1 appearances this season; Wan-Bissaka earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 1 of 3 appearances this season. Higher raw counts reflect a higher defensive workload; higher per-90 rates reflect efficiency at sustaining that workload.

Question 3

Does the Gameweek 6 fixture change the DEFCON case?

Accepted Answer

Senesi is away at Man Utd (FDR 4) and Wan-Bissaka is at home to Brentford (FDR 3) in Gameweek 6. DEFCON output is action-based rather than result-based, so a tough fixture does not shrink the base rate the way it might reduce a clean sheet probability. That said, both players are more likely to see defensive volume in tougher matches - the DEFCON case can actually be marginally stronger against stronger opposition.

Question 4

Which defender should I pick for Gameweek 6 on DEFCON grounds?

Accepted Answer

Senesi has the DEFCON edge at 16.00 per 90 versus 12.62. That advantage costs £1.3m if Senesi is dearer - work out whether the edge is worth the outlay in your specific squad. On DEFCON grounds alone Senesi is the better profile, but £1.3m spent elsewhere may return more depending on where you are stretched.

Marcos Senesi vs Aaron Wan-Bissaka DEFCON: Fantasy Premier League Gameweek 6

Marcos Senesi vs Aaron Wan-Bissaka: DEFCON Analysis

Senesi vs Wan-Bissaka Gameweek 6

Senesi has the DEFCON edge but costs £1.3m more than Wan-Bissaka. Where should the money go?