Question 1

Who has the stronger DEFCON rate: Stach or Tanaka?

Accepted Answer

Barely anything in it. Stach averages 9.99 defensive contribution actions per 90 and Tanaka averages 9.86 - a gap of 0.13 that is inside the natural noise of any per-90 metric. On the workload alone this is a coin toss and the decision should rest on fixture, price and attacking output rather than DEFCON.

Question 2

How do the raw defensive workloads of Stach and Tanaka compare?

Accepted Answer

Stach has logged 48 combined clearances, blocks, interceptions and tackles across 676 minutes (6.4 per 90). Tanaka has logged 36 across 557 minutes (5.8 per 90). Stach earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 3 of 9 appearances this season; Tanaka earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 0 of 8 appearances this season. Higher raw counts reflect a higher defensive workload; higher per-90 rates reflect efficiency at sustaining that workload.

Question 3

Does the Gameweek 10 fixture change the DEFCON case?

Accepted Answer

Stach is at home to Spurs (FDR 3) and Tanaka is at home to Spurs (FDR 3) in Gameweek 10. DEFCON output is action-based rather than result-based, so a tough fixture does not shrink the base rate the way it might reduce a clean sheet probability. That said, both players are more likely to see defensive volume in tougher matches - the DEFCON case can actually be marginally stronger against stronger opposition.

Question 4

Which midfielder should I pick for Gameweek 10 on DEFCON grounds?

Accepted Answer

The DEFCON workloads are too close to call. Both Stach and Tanaka deliver similar defensive contribution rates, so the pick should come down to price, fixtures and attacking output rather than DEFCON. On the defensive contributions alone this is a genuine coin toss.

Anton Stach vs Tanaka DEFCON: Fantasy Premier League Gameweek 10

Anton Stach vs Tanaka: DEFCON Analysis

Stach vs Tanaka Gameweek 10

Stach has the DEFCON edge but costs £1.1m more than Tanaka. Where should the money go?