Question 1

Who has the stronger DEFCON rate: Tanaka or N.Gonzalez?

Accepted Answer

Barely anything in it. Tanaka averages 9.86 defensive contribution actions per 90 and N.Gonzalez averages 9.78 - a gap of 0.08 that is inside the natural noise of any per-90 metric. On the workload alone this is a coin toss and the decision should rest on fixture, price and attacking output rather than DEFCON.

Question 2

How do the raw defensive workloads of Tanaka and N.Gonzalez compare?

Accepted Answer

Tanaka has logged 36 combined clearances, blocks, interceptions and tackles across 557 minutes (5.8 per 90). N.Gonzalez has logged 23 across 497 minutes (4.2 per 90). Tanaka earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 0 of 8 appearances this season; N.Gonzalez earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 2 of 7 appearances this season. Higher raw counts reflect a higher defensive workload; higher per-90 rates reflect efficiency at sustaining that workload.

Question 3

Does the Gameweek 10 fixture change the DEFCON case?

Accepted Answer

Tanaka is at home to Spurs (FDR 3) and N.Gonzalez is away at Fulham (FDR 3) in Gameweek 10. DEFCON output is action-based rather than result-based, so a tough fixture does not shrink the base rate the way it might reduce a clean sheet probability. That said, both players are more likely to see defensive volume in tougher matches - the DEFCON case can actually be marginally stronger against stronger opposition.

Question 4

Which midfielder should I pick for Gameweek 10 on DEFCON grounds?

Accepted Answer

The DEFCON workloads are too close to call. Both Tanaka and N.Gonzalez deliver similar defensive contribution rates, so the pick should come down to price, fixtures and attacking output rather than DEFCON. On the defensive contributions alone this is a genuine coin toss.

Tanaka vs Nico Gonzalez DEFCON: Fantasy Premier League Gameweek 10

Tanaka vs Nico Gonzalez: DEFCON Analysis

Tanaka vs N.Gonzalez Gameweek 10

Tanaka has the better DEFCON rate and is £0.6m cheaper - is it a no-brainer for your squad?