Ownership
0.1%
Form (last 6 GWs)
1.8
Expected pts, GW36
3.1
Transfers in this GW
1,151
FPL ownership
0.1% of managers own Kamada
Scale: Strong differential ≤5% ownership · Differential ≤10% · Mild ≤20% · above that is template territory.
Fixture run
GW36
DGW
Everton
H
Man City
A
GW37
Brentford
Away
GW38
Arsenal
Home
At 0.1% ownership, Kamada has maximum differential potential. A single big return would be a rank-defining moment. The risk is that low ownership can reflect what the broader game has already assessed - the form and fixture data this week are the deciding factor on whether the gamble is justified.
- Ownership: 0.1% - true differential territory
- Expected points: 3.1 xPts for GW36 - low return projection weakens the differential case
- Double Gameweek in GW36: two fixtures doubles the ceiling of a differential hold
Differential captaincy
Differential captaincy note: captaining a 0.1% owned player amplifies the rank impact of any return. At this ownership level, a 12-point haul as captain would see you gain significantly on approximately 100% of managers. The risk is proportional - a blank from a differential captain costs no rank points directly, but represents a missed opportunity relative to managers who captained a higher-return option.
Weighing Kamada as a differential in GW36
The case for picking him
- Ownership: at 0.1%, a single good return creates a meaningful rank advantage over the 100% of managers who do not own him.
- Double Gameweek: a DGW amplifies the differential upside significantly. Two chances to return means a higher ceiling for a low-owned pick.
- Fixture run: 2 manageable fixtures ahead. The schedule supports holding a differential pick beyond this week.
- Availability: no fitness concerns - a differential who misses through injury is the worst outcome.
The risks of the differential play
- Form: 1.8 pts/game over the last 6 gameweeks - low ownership can reflect what the broader game has already assessed.
- Expected points: only 3.1 xPts projected for GW36. A differential needs some return floor to be viable - the model does not back one this week.
- Low ownership may reflect consensus: when most managers avoid a player, it is worth understanding why before framing it as an opportunity.
Kamada Differential Analysis Gameweek 36
Click a question below for the full breakdown.
Ask a question
ChatFPL AI
Not sure if Kamada is the right differential call? ChatFPL AI can suggest the strongest low-ownership options available this week.
Get 20 free messages. No credit card required.
Try ChatFPL AI for free