FPLDifferential Analysis

Is Matt Targett a good differential for Fantasy Premier League Gameweek 2?

Gameweek 2 · Hull City · DEF · £4.0m

Targett
DEFHull City

Targett

Hull City

1

Pts

1.0

Form

£4.0m

Price

No credit card required
Instant access

Ownership

2.4%

Form (last 6 GWs)

1.0

Expected pts, GW2

1

Transfers in this GW

1,085

FPL ownership

2.4% of managers own Targett

0%100%

Scale: Strong differential ≤5% ownership · Differential ≤10% · Mild ≤20% · above that is template territory.

Fixture run

GW2

Coventry City

Coventry City

Away

GW3

Aston Villa

Aston Villa

Home

GW4

Chelsea

Chelsea

Away

GW5

Newcastle

Newcastle

Away

STRONG DIFFERENTIAL

At 2.4% ownership, Targett has maximum differential potential. A single big return would be a rank-defining moment. The risk is that low ownership can reflect what the broader game has already assessed - the form and fixture data this week are the deciding factor on whether the gamble is justified.

  • Ownership: 2.4% - true differential territory
  • Expected points: 1 xPts for GW2 - low return projection weakens the differential case
  • Fixture run: 3 favourable fixtures over the next 4 gameweeks

Differential captaincy

Differential captaincy note: captaining a 2.4% owned player amplifies the rank impact of any return. At this ownership level, a 12-point haul as captain would see you gain significantly on approximately 98% of managers. The risk is proportional - a blank from a differential captain costs no rank points directly, but represents a missed opportunity relative to managers who captained a higher-return option.

Weighing Targett as a differential in GW2

The case for picking him

  • Ownership: at 2.4%, a single good return creates a meaningful rank advantage over the 98% of managers who do not own him.
  • Fixture run: 3 favourable fixtures over the next 4 gameweeks - a sustained differential window, not a one-week gamble.
  • Availability: no fitness concerns - a differential who misses through injury is the worst outcome.

The risks of the differential play

  • Form: 1.0 pts/game over the last 6 gameweeks - low ownership can reflect what the broader game has already assessed.
  • Expected points: only 1 xPts projected for GW2. A differential needs some return floor to be viable - the model does not back one this week.

Targett Differential Analysis Gameweek 2

Click a question below for the full breakdown.

CF
At 2.4% ownership, Targett has maximum differential potential. A single big return would be a rank-defining moment. The risk is that low ownership can reflect what the broader game has already assessed - the form and fixture data this week are the deciding factor on whether the gamble is justified. Click a question below for the full differential breakdown.

Ask a question

ChatFPL AI

Not sure if Targett is the right differential call? ChatFPL AI can suggest the strongest low-ownership options available this week.

Get 20 free messages. No credit card required.

Try ChatFPL AI for free