FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 2

Across the season, Kai Havertz leads on total points and the gap stands at 4. On attacking output, Kai Havertz edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Erling Haaland has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Kai Havertz has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 69% for Erling Haaland and 6.3% for Kai Havertz, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 4.0 expected points for Erling Haaland.

|

Priced at £12.0m and £5.5m, there is a £6.5m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Bruno Fernandes at 0.2 against Pascal Groß at 0.4. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Bruno Fernandes the edge at 4.0 projected points. With ownership at 50.8% and 14% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Antoine Semenyo at 2.9 for Gameweek 2, against 2.8 for Bryan Mbeumo, a gap of 0.1 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Bryan Mbeumo has averaged 2.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Antoine Semenyo is averaging 2.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Christos Tzolis leads on total points and the gap stands at 4. On attacking output, Christos Tzolis edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Bryan Mbeumo has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Christos Tzolis has 0 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 37.8% for Bryan Mbeumo and 25.4% for Christos Tzolis, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.8 expected points for Bryan Mbeumo.

|

Priced at £8.0m and £7.5m, there is a £0.5m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Bryan Mbeumo generates more points per million this season. Bryan Mbeumo at 0.3 against Morgan Rogers at 0. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Bryan Mbeumo the edge at 2.8 projected points. With ownership at 37.8% and 24.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Nico O'Reilly at 3.1 for Gameweek 2, against 2.5 for Riccardo Calafiori, a gap of 0.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Riccardo Calafiori has averaged 9.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Nico O'Reilly is averaging 2.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Declan Rice leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Bryan Mbeumo edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Bryan Mbeumo has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Declan Rice has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 37.8% for Bryan Mbeumo and 17.9% for Declan Rice, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.8 expected points for Bryan Mbeumo.

|

Priced at £5.5m and £4.5m, there is a £1.0m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Riccardo Calafiori generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 1.6 against Ezri Konsa at 0. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Riccardo Calafiori the edge at 2.5 projected points. With ownership at 40.4% and 12.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Gabriel at 4.0 for Gameweek 2, against 3.1 for Nico O'Reilly, a gap of 0.9 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Gabriel has averaged 5.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Nico O'Reilly is averaging 2.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Gabriel leads on total points and the gap stands at 4. On attacking output, Gabriel edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Gabriel has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Luke Shaw has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 29.6% for Gabriel and 20.8% for Luke Shaw, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 4.0 expected points for Gabriel.

|

Priced at £6.0m and £8.0m, there is a £2.0m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Dominic Calvert-Lewin generates more points per million this season. Dominic Calvert-Lewin at 0.2 against Igor Thiago at 0. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Igor Thiago the edge at 2.5 projected points. With ownership at 30.5% and 17.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Alexander Isak at 2.7 for Gameweek 2, against 2.0 for Dominic Calvert-Lewin, a gap of 0.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Alexander Isak has averaged 2.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Dominic Calvert-Lewin is averaging 1.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Marc Guéhi leads on total points and the gap stands at 5. On attacking output, Marc Guéhi edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Gabriel has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Marc Guéhi has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 29.6% for Gabriel and 17.6% for Marc Guéhi, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 4.0 expected points for Gabriel.

|

Priced at £7.5m and £8.5m, there is a £1.0m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Declan Rice generates more points per million this season. Declan Rice at 0.4 against Antoine Semenyo at 0.2. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Antoine Semenyo the edge at 2.9 projected points. With ownership at 17.9% and 25.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Gabriel at 4.0 for Gameweek 2, against 1.0 for Milan van Ewijk, a gap of 3.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Gabriel has averaged 5.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Milan van Ewijk is averaging 1.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Marc Guéhi leads on total points and the gap stands at 8. On attacking output, Marc Guéhi edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Marc Guéhi has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Nico O'Reilly has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 17.6% for Marc Guéhi and 21.4% for Nico O'Reilly, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 3.1 expected points for Nico O'Reilly.

|

Priced at £4.0m and £5.0m, there is a £1.0m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Issa Diop generates more points per million this season. Issa Diop at 0.5 against Harry Maguire at 0.2. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Harry Maguire the edge at 2.2 projected points. With ownership at 18.1% and 17.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Marc Guéhi at 2.8 for Gameweek 2, against 1.0 for Issa Diop, a gap of 1.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Marc Guéhi has averaged 10.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Issa Diop is averaging 2.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Luke Shaw leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Ezri Konsa edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Ezri Konsa has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Luke Shaw has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 12.3% for Ezri Konsa and 20.8% for Luke Shaw, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 1.7 expected points for Ezri Konsa.

|

Priced at £5.0m and £4.0m, there is a £1.0m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Milan van Ewijk generates more points per million this season. Harry Maguire at 0.2 against Milan van Ewijk at 0.3. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Harry Maguire the edge at 2.2 projected points. With ownership at 17.9% and 13.6% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Alexander Isak at 2.7 for Gameweek 2, against 2.0 for Brian Brobbey, a gap of 0.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Brian Brobbey has averaged 2.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Alexander Isak is averaging 2.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Iliman Ndiaye leads on total points and the gap stands at 7. On attacking output, Iliman Ndiaye edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Pascal Groß has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Iliman Ndiaye has 0 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 14% for Pascal Groß and 16% for Iliman Ndiaye, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.2 expected points for Iliman Ndiaye.

|

Priced at £5.5m and £7.5m, there is a £2.0m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Pascal Groß at 0.4 against Florian Wirtz at 0.3. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Florian Wirtz the edge at 2.6 projected points. With ownership at 14% and 12.6% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Ezri Konsa at 1.7 for Gameweek 2, against 1.0 for Milan van Ewijk, a gap of 0.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Milan van Ewijk has averaged 1.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Ezri Konsa is averaging 0.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Brian Brobbey leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, Brian Brobbey edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Brian Brobbey has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Viktor Gyökeres has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 13.9% for Brian Brobbey and 8.4% for Viktor Gyökeres, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.4 expected points for Viktor Gyökeres.

|