FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 6

Priced at £15.6m and £5.6m, there is a £10.0m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Charalampos Kostoulas generates more points per million this season. Erling Haaland at 2.5 against Charalampos Kostoulas at 5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Charalampos Kostoulas the edge at 10.0 projected points. With ownership at 74% and 5.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

Sindre Walle Egeli has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Erling Haaland the clear short-term pick. Erling Haaland carries 7.5 expected points and 7.5 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Bruno Fernandes leads on total points and the gap stands at 11. On attacking output, Bruno Fernandes edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Bruno Fernandes has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Dominik Szoboszlai has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 38.3% for Bruno Fernandes and 32% for Dominik Szoboszlai, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 2.5 expected points for Dominik Szoboszlai.

|

Priced at £5.9m and £6.5m, there is a £0.6m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Riccardo Calafiori generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 4.9 against Virgil at 3.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Virgil the edge at 8.0 projected points. With ownership at 50.7% and 16.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Riccardo Calafiori at 3.5 for Gameweek 6, against 1.0 for Semi Ajayi, a gap of 2.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Riccardo Calafiori has averaged 3.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Semi Ajayi is averaging 1.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Pascal Groß leads on total points and the gap stands at 27. On attacking output, Pascal Groß edges the combined goals and assists count with 7 direct contributions. Pascal Groß has 3 goals and 4 assists this season; Dominik Szoboszlai has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 31% for Pascal Groß and 32% for Dominik Szoboszlai, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 15.5 expected points for Pascal Groß.

|

Priced at £7.9m and £7.8m, there is a £0.1m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Morgan Rogers generates more points per million this season. Bryan Mbeumo at 3.2 against Morgan Rogers at 3.7. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Morgan Rogers the edge at 5.0 projected points. With ownership at 20.4% and 41.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Martin Ødegaard at 2.5 for Gameweek 6, against 2.0 for Bruno Fernandes, a gap of 0.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Martin Ødegaard has averaged 2.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Bruno Fernandes is averaging 2.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Morgan Rogers leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Morgan Rogers edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Morgan Gibbs-White has 1 goals and 2 assists this season; Morgan Rogers has 3 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 15.7% for Morgan Gibbs-White and 41.3% for Morgan Rogers, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.0 expected points for Morgan Gibbs-White.

|

Priced at £6.8m and £6.9m, there is a £0.1m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Martin Ødegaard generates more points per million this season. Martin Ødegaard at 4.3 against Dominik Szoboszlai at 2.9. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Martin Ødegaard the edge at 2.5 projected points. With ownership at 19.9% and 32% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Rayan Cherki at 4.5 for Gameweek 6, against 2.5 for Martin Ødegaard, a gap of 2.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Rayan Cherki has averaged 4.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Martin Ødegaard is averaging 2.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Pascal Groß leads on total points and the gap stands at 19. On attacking output, Pascal Groß edges the combined goals and assists count with 7 direct contributions. Morgan Gibbs-White has 1 goals and 2 assists this season; Pascal Groß has 3 goals and 4 assists. Ownership sits at 15.7% for Morgan Gibbs-White and 31% for Pascal Groß, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 15.5 expected points for Pascal Groß.

|

Priced at £5.7m and £5.3m, there is a £0.4m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Joško Gvardiol generates more points per million this season. Joško Gvardiol at 6.5 against Lewis Hall at 5.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Joško Gvardiol the edge at 7.5 projected points. With ownership at 27% and 18.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Dominic Calvert-Lewin at 6.0 for Gameweek 6, against 1.0 for Yoane Wissa, a gap of 5.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Dominic Calvert-Lewin has averaged 6.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Yoane Wissa is averaging 1.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, James Tarkowski leads on total points and the gap stands at 12. On attacking output, Lewis Hall edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Lewis Hall has 1 goals and 1 assists this season; James Tarkowski has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 18.3% for Lewis Hall and 17.3% for James Tarkowski, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 11.0 expected points for James Tarkowski.

|

Priced at £7.9m and £9.6m, there is a £1.7m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Bukayo Saka generates more points per million this season. Bryan Mbeumo at 3.2 against Bukayo Saka at 3.3. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Bukayo Saka the edge at 5.0 projected points. With ownership at 20.4% and 14.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Virgil at 8.0 for Gameweek 6, against 6.5 for Lewis Hall, a gap of 1.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Virgil has averaged 8.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Lewis Hall is averaging 6.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, James Tarkowski leads on total points and the gap stands at 18. On attacking output, James Tarkowski edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. James Tarkowski has 1 goals and 1 assists this season; Virgil has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 17.3% for James Tarkowski and 16.2% for Virgil, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 11.0 expected points for James Tarkowski.

|

Priced at £6.8m and £6.2m, there is a £0.6m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Kevin Schade generates more points per million this season. Martin Ødegaard at 4.3 against Kevin Schade at 6.3. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Kevin Schade the edge at 12.0 projected points. With ownership at 19.9% and 12.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Marc Guéhi at 5.0 for Gameweek 6, against 2.5 for Issa Diop, a gap of 2.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Marc Guéhi has averaged 5.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Issa Diop is averaging 2.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Thierno Barry leads on total points and the gap stands at 5. On attacking output, Thierno Barry edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Thierno Barry has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Yoane Wissa has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 8.5% for Thierno Barry and 18.8% for Yoane Wissa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 4.0 expected points for Thierno Barry.

|

Sindre Walle Egeli has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Yoane Wissa the clear short-term pick. Yoane Wissa carries 1.0 expected points and 1.0 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|

Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Igor Thiago the clear short-term pick. Igor Thiago carries 3.0 expected points and 3.0 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|

Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Gonzalo the clear short-term pick. Gonzalo carries 2.0 expected points and 2.0 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|

Priced at £5.5m and £5.6m, there is a £0.1m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Charalampos Kostoulas generates more points per million this season. Emersonn at 4.7 against Charalampos Kostoulas at 5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Charalampos Kostoulas the edge at 10.0 projected points. With ownership at 3.8% and 5.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|