Question 1

Who has the stronger DEFCON rate: Anderson or Ndiaye?

Accepted Answer

Barely anything in it. Anderson averages 12.54 defensive contribution actions per 90 and Ndiaye averages 11.58 - a gap of 0.96 that is inside the natural noise of any per-90 metric. On the workload alone this is a coin toss and the decision should rest on fixture, price and attacking output rather than DEFCON.

Question 2

How do the raw defensive workloads of Anderson and Ndiaye compare?

Accepted Answer

Anderson has logged 25 combined clearances, blocks, interceptions and tackles across 323 minutes (7.0 per 90). Ndiaye has logged 17 across 311 minutes (4.9 per 90). Anderson has 45 total defensive contribution actions and Ndiaye has 40. Higher raw counts reflect a higher defensive workload; higher per-90 rates reflect efficiency at sustaining that workload.

Question 3

Does the Gameweek 6 fixture change the DEFCON case?

Accepted Answer

Anderson's fixture is not yet confirmed and Ndiaye's fixture is not yet confirmed in Gameweek 6. DEFCON output is action-based rather than result-based, so a tough fixture does not shrink the base rate the way it might reduce a clean sheet probability. That said, both players are more likely to see defensive volume in tougher matches - the DEFCON case can actually be marginally stronger against stronger opposition.

Question 4

Which midfielder should I pick for Gameweek 6 on DEFCON grounds?

Accepted Answer

The DEFCON workloads are too close to call. Both Anderson and Ndiaye deliver similar defensive contribution rates, so the pick should come down to price, fixtures and attacking output rather than DEFCON. On the defensive contributions alone this is a genuine coin toss.

Elliot Anderson vs Iliman Ndiaye DEFCON: Fantasy Premier League Gameweek 6

Elliot Anderson vs Iliman Ndiaye: DEFCON Analysis

Anderson vs Ndiaye Gameweek 6

Anderson has the DEFCON edge but costs £0.5m more than Ndiaye. Where should the money go?