Question 1

Who has the stronger DEFCON rate: M.Sangaré or Schlager?

Accepted Answer

M.Sangaré is the stronger DEFCON profile at 16.22 actions per 90 against 12.16 for Schlager - a gap of 4.06 per 90. Over a 38-match season that difference works out to roughly 154 extra defensive contribution actions before any attacking upside is factored in.

Question 2

How do the raw defensive workloads of M.Sangaré and Schlager compare?

Accepted Answer

M.Sangaré has logged 54 combined clearances, blocks, interceptions and tackles across 555 minutes (8.8 per 90). Schlager has logged 46 across 666 minutes (6.2 per 90). M.Sangaré earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 4 of 9 appearances this season; Schlager earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 4 of 9 appearances this season. Higher raw counts reflect a higher defensive workload; higher per-90 rates reflect efficiency at sustaining that workload.

Question 3

Does the Gameweek 10 fixture change the DEFCON case?

Accepted Answer

M.Sangaré is away at Brighton (FDR 4) and Schlager is at home to Man City (FDR 4) in Gameweek 10. DEFCON output is action-based rather than result-based, so a tough fixture does not shrink the base rate the way it might reduce a clean sheet probability. That said, both players are more likely to see defensive volume in tougher matches - the DEFCON case can actually be marginally stronger against stronger opposition.

Question 4

Which midfielder should I pick for Gameweek 10 on DEFCON grounds?

Accepted Answer

M.Sangaré has the DEFCON edge at 16.22 per 90 versus 12.16. That advantage costs £0.4m if M.Sangaré is dearer - work out whether the edge is worth the outlay in your specific squad. On DEFCON grounds alone M.Sangaré is the better profile, but £0.4m spent elsewhere may return more depending on where you are stretched.

Mamadou Sangaré vs Xaver Schlager DEFCON: Fantasy Premier League Gameweek 10

Mamadou Sangaré vs Xaver Schlager: DEFCON Analysis

M.Sangaré vs Schlager Gameweek 10

M.Sangaré has the DEFCON edge but costs £0.4m more than Schlager. Where should the money go?