Question 1

Who has the stronger DEFCON rate: Pinnock or Silva?

Accepted Answer

Pinnock is the stronger DEFCON profile at 11.72 actions per 90 against 10.25 for Silva - a gap of 1.47 per 90. Over a 38-match season that difference works out to roughly 56 extra defensive contribution actions before any attacking upside is factored in.

Question 2

How do the raw defensive workloads of Pinnock and Silva compare?

Accepted Answer

Pinnock has logged 25 combined clearances, blocks, interceptions and tackles across 192 minutes (11.7 per 90). Silva has logged 41 across 360 minutes (10.3 per 90). Pinnock earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 2 of 3 appearances this season; Silva earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 3 of 4 appearances this season. Higher raw counts reflect a higher defensive workload; higher per-90 rates reflect efficiency at sustaining that workload.

Question 3

Does the Gameweek 6 fixture change the DEFCON case?

Accepted Answer

Pinnock is at home to Newcastle (FDR 2) and Silva is away at Chelsea (FDR 4) in Gameweek 6. DEFCON output is action-based rather than result-based, so a tough fixture does not shrink the base rate the way it might reduce a clean sheet probability. That said, both players are more likely to see defensive volume in tougher matches - the DEFCON case can actually be marginally stronger against stronger opposition.

Question 4

Which defender should I pick for Gameweek 6 on DEFCON grounds?

Accepted Answer

Pinnock has the DEFCON edge at 11.72 per 90 versus 10.25. That advantage costs £0.5m if Pinnock is dearer - work out whether the edge is worth the outlay in your specific squad. On DEFCON grounds alone Pinnock is the better profile, but £0.5m spent elsewhere may return more depending on where you are stretched.

Ethan Pinnock vs Silva DEFCON: Fantasy Premier League Gameweek 6

Ethan Pinnock vs Silva: DEFCON Analysis

Pinnock vs Silva Gameweek 6

Pinnock has the better DEFCON rate and is £0.5m cheaper - is it a no-brainer for your squad?