Question 1

Who has the stronger DEFCON rate: Richards or Silva?

Accepted Answer

Barely anything in it. Richards averages 11.00 defensive contribution actions per 90 and Silva averages 10.25 - a gap of 0.75 that is inside the natural noise of any per-90 metric. On the workload alone this is a coin toss and the decision should rest on fixture, price and attacking output rather than DEFCON.

Question 2

How do the raw defensive workloads of Richards and Silva compare?

Accepted Answer

Richards has logged 44 combined clearances, blocks, interceptions and tackles across 360 minutes (11.0 per 90). Silva has logged 41 across 360 minutes (10.3 per 90). Richards earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 2 of 4 appearances this season; Silva earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 3 of 4 appearances this season. Higher raw counts reflect a higher defensive workload; higher per-90 rates reflect efficiency at sustaining that workload.

Question 3

Does the Gameweek 6 fixture change the DEFCON case?

Accepted Answer

Richards is at home to Nott'm Forest (FDR 3) and Silva is away at Chelsea (FDR 4) in Gameweek 6. DEFCON output is action-based rather than result-based, so a tough fixture does not shrink the base rate the way it might reduce a clean sheet probability. That said, both players are more likely to see defensive volume in tougher matches - the DEFCON case can actually be marginally stronger against stronger opposition.

Question 4

Which defender should I pick for Gameweek 6 on DEFCON grounds?

Accepted Answer

The DEFCON workloads are too close to call. Both Richards and Silva deliver similar defensive contribution rates, so the pick should come down to price, fixtures and attacking output rather than DEFCON. On the defensive contributions alone this is a genuine coin toss.

Chris Richards vs Silva DEFCON: Fantasy Premier League Gameweek 6

Chris Richards vs Silva: DEFCON Analysis

Richards vs Silva Gameweek 6

Richards has the DEFCON edge at a similar price. Would he fit your specific squad?