Question 1

Who has the stronger DEFCON rate: Scott or Anderson?

Accepted Answer

Barely anything in it. Scott averages 13.15 defensive contribution actions per 90 and Anderson averages 12.54 - a gap of 0.61 that is inside the natural noise of any per-90 metric. On the workload alone this is a coin toss and the decision should rest on fixture, price and attacking output rather than DEFCON.

Question 2

How do the raw defensive workloads of Scott and Anderson compare?

Accepted Answer

Scott has logged 24 combined clearances, blocks, interceptions and tackles across 356 minutes (6.1 per 90). Anderson has logged 25 across 323 minutes (7.0 per 90). Scott earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 2 of 4 appearances this season; Anderson earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 2 of 4 appearances this season. Higher raw counts reflect a higher defensive workload; higher per-90 rates reflect efficiency at sustaining that workload.

Question 3

Does the Gameweek 6 fixture change the DEFCON case?

Accepted Answer

Scott is away at Chelsea (FDR 4) and Anderson is away at Liverpool (FDR 4) in Gameweek 6. DEFCON output is action-based rather than result-based, so a tough fixture does not shrink the base rate the way it might reduce a clean sheet probability. That said, both players are more likely to see defensive volume in tougher matches - the DEFCON case can actually be marginally stronger against stronger opposition.

Question 4

Which midfielder should I pick for Gameweek 6 on DEFCON grounds?

Accepted Answer

The DEFCON workloads are too close to call. Both Scott and Anderson deliver similar defensive contribution rates, so the pick should come down to price, fixtures and attacking output rather than DEFCON. On the defensive contributions alone this is a genuine coin toss.

Alex Scott vs Elliot Anderson DEFCON: Fantasy Premier League Gameweek 6

Alex Scott vs Elliot Anderson: DEFCON Analysis

Scott vs Anderson Gameweek 6

Scott has the better DEFCON rate and is £0.2m cheaper - is it a no-brainer for your squad?