Question 1

Who has the stronger DEFCON rate: Silva or Richards?

Accepted Answer

Richards is the stronger DEFCON profile at 11.67 actions per 90 against 10.33 for Silva - a gap of 1.34 per 90. Over a 38-match season that difference works out to roughly 51 extra defensive contribution actions before any attacking upside is factored in.

Question 2

How do the raw defensive workloads of Silva and Richards compare?

Accepted Answer

Silva has logged 93 combined clearances, blocks, interceptions and tackles across 810 minutes (10.3 per 90). Richards has logged 105 across 810 minutes (11.7 per 90). Silva earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 6 of 9 appearances this season; Richards earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 7 of 9 appearances this season. Higher raw counts reflect a higher defensive workload; higher per-90 rates reflect efficiency at sustaining that workload.

Question 3

Does the Gameweek 10 fixture change the DEFCON case?

Accepted Answer

Silva is away at Ipswich Town (FDR 2) and Richards is at home to Liverpool (FDR 4) in Gameweek 10. DEFCON output is action-based rather than result-based, so a tough fixture does not shrink the base rate the way it might reduce a clean sheet probability. That said, both players are more likely to see defensive volume in tougher matches - the DEFCON case can actually be marginally stronger against stronger opposition.

Question 4

Which defender should I pick for Gameweek 10 on DEFCON grounds?

Accepted Answer

Richards has the DEFCON edge at 11.67 per 90 versus 10.33. That advantage costs £0.1m if Richards is dearer - work out whether the edge is worth the outlay in your specific squad. On DEFCON grounds alone Richards is the better profile, but £0.1m spent elsewhere may return more depending on where you are stretched.

Silva vs Chris Richards DEFCON: Fantasy Premier League Gameweek 10

Silva vs Chris Richards: DEFCON Analysis

Silva vs Richards Gameweek 10

Richards has the DEFCON edge at a similar price. Would he fit your specific squad?