Question 1

Who has the stronger DEFCON rate: Tarkowski or Silva?

Accepted Answer

Barely anything in it. Tarkowski averages 10.44 defensive contribution actions per 90 and Silva averages 10.33 - a gap of 0.11 that is inside the natural noise of any per-90 metric. On the workload alone this is a coin toss and the decision should rest on fixture, price and attacking output rather than DEFCON.

Question 2

How do the raw defensive workloads of Tarkowski and Silva compare?

Accepted Answer

Tarkowski has logged 94 combined clearances, blocks, interceptions and tackles across 810 minutes (10.4 per 90). Silva has logged 93 across 810 minutes (10.3 per 90). Tarkowski earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 5 of 9 appearances this season; Silva earned the +2pt DEFCON bonus in 6 of 9 appearances this season. Higher raw counts reflect a higher defensive workload; higher per-90 rates reflect efficiency at sustaining that workload.

Question 3

Does the Gameweek 10 fixture change the DEFCON case?

Accepted Answer

Tarkowski is at home to Coventry City (FDR 2) and Silva is away at Ipswich Town (FDR 2) in Gameweek 10. DEFCON output is action-based rather than result-based, so a tough fixture does not shrink the base rate the way it might reduce a clean sheet probability. That said, both players are more likely to see defensive volume in tougher matches - the DEFCON case can actually be marginally stronger against stronger opposition.

Question 4

Which defender should I pick for Gameweek 10 on DEFCON grounds?

Accepted Answer

The DEFCON workloads are too close to call. Both Tarkowski and Silva deliver similar defensive contribution rates, so the pick should come down to price, fixtures and attacking output rather than DEFCON. On the defensive contributions alone this is a genuine coin toss.

James Tarkowski vs Silva DEFCON: Fantasy Premier League Gameweek 10

James Tarkowski vs Silva: DEFCON Analysis

Tarkowski vs Silva Gameweek 10

Tarkowski has the DEFCON edge but costs £1.1m more than Silva. Where should the money go?