Quinten Timber vs Ryan Gravenberch DEFCON: Fantasy Premier League Gameweek 6

Head-to-head DEFCON comparison for two midfielders. Per-90 rate, raw workload and Gameweek 6 recommendation.

No credit card required
Instant access

Season is early - both DEFCON rates reflect a small sample and will settle from Gameweek 7 or 8 onwards.

Quinten Timber

Timber

Crystal Palace

MID · £5.0m

12.15

DC/90

22

DC

13

CBIT

Bonus at 12+ CBIT

vs
Ryan Gravenberch

Gravenberch

Liverpool

MID · £5.8m

11.93

DC/90

24

DC

14

CBIT

Bonus at 12+ CBIT

Quinten Timber vs Ryan Gravenberch: DEFCON Analysis

PhotoPlayerDC/90DCCBITMinutesSeason PtsGW xPtsPrice
Timber

Timber

MID - Crystal Palace

12.15221316362.0£5.0m
Gravenberch

Gravenberch

MID - Liverpool

11.93241418181.6£5.8m
DEFCON Coin Toss

The DEFCON rates are near-identical - the decision should rest on price, fixtures and attacking output.

  • Timber: 12.15 defensive contribution actions per 90 across 163 minutes (22 total actions).
  • Gravenberch: 11.93 defensive contribution actions per 90 across 181 minutes (24 total actions).
  • Timber is £0.8m cheaper.

Timber vs Gravenberch Gameweek 6

Click a question below and get the full breakdown.

CF
I've pulled the DEFCON data for Quinten Timber and Ryan Gravenberch in Gameweek 6. Click any question below for the full breakdown.

Ask a question

ChatFPL AI

Timber has the better DEFCON rate and is £0.8m cheaper - is it a no-brainer for your squad?

ChatFPL AI factors in your specific squad, chip strategy and remaining budget before recommending.

Try ChatFPL AI Free