Season is early - both DEFCON rates reflect a small sample and will settle from Gameweek 7 or 8 onwards.

Timber
MID · £5.0m
12.15
DC/90
22
DC
13
CBIT
Bonus at 12+ CBIT
vs

Gravenberch
MID · £5.8m
11.93
DC/90
24
DC
14
CBIT
Bonus at 12+ CBIT
Quinten Timber vs Ryan Gravenberch: DEFCON Analysis
| Photo | Player | DC/90 | DC | CBIT | Minutes | Season Pts | GW xPts | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | Timber MID - Crystal Palace | 12.15 | 22 | 13 | 163 | 6 | 2.0 | £5.0m |
![]() | Gravenberch MID - Liverpool | 11.93 | 24 | 14 | 181 | 8 | 1.6 | £5.8m |
DEFCON Coin Toss
The DEFCON rates are near-identical - the decision should rest on price, fixtures and attacking output.
- Timber: 12.15 defensive contribution actions per 90 across 163 minutes (22 total actions).
- Gravenberch: 11.93 defensive contribution actions per 90 across 181 minutes (24 total actions).
- Timber is £0.8m cheaper.
Timber vs Gravenberch Gameweek 6
Click a question below and get the full breakdown.
CF
I've pulled the DEFCON data for Quinten Timber and Ryan Gravenberch in Gameweek 6. Click any question below for the full breakdown.
Ask a question
ChatFPL AI
Timber has the better DEFCON rate and is £0.8m cheaper - is it a no-brainer for your squad?
ChatFPL AI factors in your specific squad, chip strategy and remaining budget before recommending.
Try ChatFPL AI Free
