The expected points model has Erling Haaland at 6.6 for Gameweek 6, against 1.4 for Brian Brobbey, a gap of 5.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Erling Haaland has averaged 6.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Brian Brobbey is averaging 1.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Erling Haaland leads on total points and the gap stands at 21. On attacking output, Erling Haaland edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Gonzalo has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Erling Haaland has 4 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 3.7% for Gonzalo and 73.3% for Erling Haaland, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.6 expected points for Erling Haaland.
|
Priced at £5.8m and £6.0m, there is a £0.2m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Riccardo Calafiori generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 4.8 against Marc Guéhi at 4.3. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Riccardo Calafiori the edge at 5.6 projected points. With ownership at 50.7% and 18.6% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Morgan Rogers at 5.8 for Gameweek 6, against 5.2 for Rayan Cherki, a gap of 0.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Morgan Rogers has averaged 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Rayan Cherki is averaging 5.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Bruno Fernandes leads on total points and the gap stands at 3. On attacking output, Bruno Fernandes edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Bruno Fernandes has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Rayan Cherki has 2 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 39.9% for Bruno Fernandes and 28% for Rayan Cherki, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.8 expected points for Bruno Fernandes.
|
Priced at £9.7m and £7.7m, there is a £2.0m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Morgan Rogers generates more points per million this season. Cole Palmer at 2.9 against Morgan Rogers at 3.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Morgan Rogers the edge at 5.8 projected points. With ownership at 27% and 40% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Joško Gvardiol at 6.6 for Gameweek 6, against 4.8 for Gabriel, a gap of 1.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Joško Gvardiol has averaged 6.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Gabriel is averaging 4.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Dominic Calvert-Lewin
Across the season, Dominic Calvert-Lewin leads on total points and the gap stands at 5. On attacking output, Dominic Calvert-Lewin edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Dominic Calvert-Lewin has 2 goals and 1 assists this season; Yoane Wissa has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 25.7% for Dominic Calvert-Lewin and 19.3% for Yoane Wissa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 4.0 expected points for Dominic Calvert-Lewin.
|
Priced at £8.0m and £4.6m, there is a £3.4m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Gabriel generates more points per million this season. Gabriel at 3 against Ezri Konsa at 2.4. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Gabriel the edge at 4.8 projected points. With ownership at 23.1% and 19.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Marc Guéhi at 5.2 for Gameweek 6, against 4.8 for Gabriel, a gap of 0.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Marc Guéhi has averaged 5.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Gabriel is averaging 4.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Alexander Isak leads on total points and the gap stands at 10. On attacking output, Alexander Isak edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Alexander Isak has 3 goals and 0 assists this season; Yoane Wissa has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 21.9% for Alexander Isak and 19.3% for Yoane Wissa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.0 expected points for Alexander Isak.
|
Priced at £5.7m and £5.2m, there is a £0.5m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Joško Gvardiol generates more points per million this season. Joško Gvardiol at 5.8 against Lewis Hall at 3.5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Joško Gvardiol the edge at 6.6 projected points. With ownership at 25.9% and 14.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has James Tarkowski at 5.8 for Gameweek 6, against 4.8 for Gabriel, a gap of 1.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: James Tarkowski has averaged 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Gabriel is averaging 4.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Pascal Groß leads on total points and the gap stands at 17. On attacking output, Pascal Groß edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Pascal Groß has 2 goals and 3 assists this season; Antoine Semenyo has 0 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 21.5% for Pascal Groß and 14.7% for Antoine Semenyo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.6 expected points for Pascal Groß.
|
Priced at £6.0m and £6.5m, there is a £0.5m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Marc Guéhi generates more points per million this season. Marc Guéhi at 4.3 against Virgil at 2.6. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Marc Guéhi the edge at 5.2 projected points. With ownership at 18.6% and 16.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
Martin Ødegaard
The expected points model has Martin Ødegaard at 5.4 for Gameweek 6, against 3.2 for Antoine Semenyo, a gap of 2.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Martin Ødegaard has averaged 5.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Antoine Semenyo is averaging 3.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Marc Guéhi leads on total points and the gap stands at 8. On attacking output, Marc Guéhi edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Marc Guéhi has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Lewis Hall has 0 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 18.6% for Marc Guéhi and 14.9% for Lewis Hall, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.2 expected points for Marc Guéhi.
|
Priced at £5.6m and £9.1m, there is a £3.5m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Alexander Isak generates more points per million this season. Thierno Barry at 2.5 against Alexander Isak at 2.7. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Alexander Isak the edge at 5.0 projected points. With ownership at 7.9% and 21.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Semi Ajayi at 5.2 for Gameweek 6, against 3.6 for Lewis Hall, a gap of 1.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Semi Ajayi has averaged 5.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Lewis Hall is averaging 3.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Yoane Wissa leads on total points and the gap stands at 5. On attacking output, Yoane Wissa edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Igor Thiago has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Yoane Wissa has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 8.9% for Igor Thiago and 19.3% for Yoane Wissa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 3.0 expected points for Yoane Wissa.
|
Priced at £5.7m and £6.2m, there is a £0.5m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Yoane Wissa generates more points per million this season. Brian Brobbey at 1.2 against Yoane Wissa at 2.4. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Yoane Wissa the edge at 3.0 projected points. With ownership at 5.4% and 19.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Yoane Wissa at 3.0 for Gameweek 6, against 2.4 for Gonzalo, a gap of 0.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Yoane Wissa has averaged 3.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Gonzalo is averaging 2.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Thierno Barry leads on total points and the gap stands at 4. On attacking output, Thierno Barry edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Thierno Barry has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Igor Thiago has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 7.9% for Thierno Barry and 8.9% for Igor Thiago, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 2.8 expected points for Thierno Barry.
|
Priced at £5.6m and £7.6m, there is a £2.0m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Thierno Barry generates more points per million this season. Thierno Barry at 2.5 against Kai Havertz at 2.2. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Kai Havertz the edge at 3.4 projected points. With ownership at 7.9% and 8.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Kai Havertz at 3.4 for Gameweek 6, against 1.4 for Brian Brobbey, a gap of 2.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Kai Havertz has averaged 3.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Brian Brobbey is averaging 1.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
25 random matchups from the top 10 most-owned defenders, midfielders and forwards for GW6. Ranked by combined ownership. Excludes goalkeepers and ruled-out players. Refreshes each visit.