FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 6

Priced at £6.0m and £15.6m, there is a £9.6m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Dominic Calvert-Lewin generates more points per million this season. Dominic Calvert-Lewin at 3.7 against Erling Haaland at 2.5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Erling Haaland the edge at 7.8 projected points. With ownership at 25.5% and 73.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Bruno Fernandes at 6.0 for Gameweek 6, against 5.8 for Morgan Rogers, a gap of 0.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Bruno Fernandes has averaged 6.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Morgan Rogers is averaging 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Erling Haaland leads on total points and the gap stands at 15. On attacking output, Erling Haaland edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Brian Brobbey has 3 goals and 0 assists this season; Erling Haaland has 5 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 5.9% for Brian Brobbey and 73.4% for Erling Haaland, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 7.8 expected points for Erling Haaland.

|

Priced at £5.8m and £8.0m, there is a £2.2m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Riccardo Calafiori generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 5 against Gabriel at 3.1. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Riccardo Calafiori the edge at 5.8 projected points. With ownership at 50.7% and 22.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Morgan Rogers at 5.8 for Gameweek 6, against 5.6 for Cole Palmer, a gap of 0.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Morgan Rogers has averaged 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Cole Palmer is averaging 5.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Cole Palmer leads on total points and the gap stands at 8. On attacking output, Cole Palmer edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Cole Palmer has 2 goals and 2 assists this season; Dominik Szoboszlai has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 26.7% for Cole Palmer and 33.9% for Dominik Szoboszlai, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.6 expected points for Cole Palmer.

|

Priced at £5.8m and £7.0m, there is a £1.2m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Pascal Groß at 8.1 against Dominik Szoboszlai at 2.9. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Pascal Groß the edge at 9.4 projected points. With ownership at 25.1% and 33.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Morgan Gibbs-White at 5.6 for Gameweek 6, against 4.0 for Dominik Szoboszlai, a gap of 1.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Morgan Gibbs-White has averaged 5.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Dominik Szoboszlai is averaging 4.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Rayan Cherki leads on total points and the gap stands at 10. On attacking output, Rayan Cherki edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Rayan Cherki has 3 goals and 2 assists this season; Bryan Mbeumo has 2 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 27.9% for Rayan Cherki and 21.3% for Bryan Mbeumo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.8 expected points for Rayan Cherki.

|

Priced at £8.0m and £5.7m, there is a £2.3m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Joško Gvardiol generates more points per million this season. Gabriel at 3.1 against Joško Gvardiol at 6.5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Joško Gvardiol the edge at 7.4 projected points. With ownership at 22.9% and 26.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Joško Gvardiol at 7.4 for Gameweek 6, against 2.4 for Ezri Konsa, a gap of 5.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Joško Gvardiol has averaged 7.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Ezri Konsa is averaging 2.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Pascal Groß leads on total points and the gap stands at 18. On attacking output, Pascal Groß edges the combined goals and assists count with 7 direct contributions. Martin Ødegaard has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Pascal Groß has 3 goals and 4 assists. Ownership sits at 19.9% for Martin Ødegaard and 25.1% for Pascal Groß, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 9.4 expected points for Pascal Groß.

|

Priced at £4.9m and £6.0m, there is a £1.1m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Maxim De Cuyper generates more points per million this season. Maxim De Cuyper at 7.8 against Marc Guéhi at 5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Maxim De Cuyper the edge at 7.6 projected points. With ownership at 26.2% and 18.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Joško Gvardiol at 7.4 for Gameweek 6, against 5.0 for Virgil, a gap of 2.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Joško Gvardiol has averaged 7.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Virgil is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, James Tarkowski leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Joško Gvardiol edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Joško Gvardiol has 1 goals and 3 assists this season; James Tarkowski has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 26.2% for Joško Gvardiol and 14.9% for James Tarkowski, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 8.6 expected points for James Tarkowski.

|

Priced at £9.1m and £6.2m, there is a £2.9m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Alexander Isak generates more points per million this season. Alexander Isak at 3.6 against Yoane Wissa at 2.4. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Alexander Isak the edge at 6.6 projected points. With ownership at 22% and 19% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Lewis Hall at 6.2 for Gameweek 6, against 5.0 for Gabriel, a gap of 1.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Lewis Hall has averaged 6.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Gabriel is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Marc Guéhi leads on total points and the gap stands at 18. On attacking output, Marc Guéhi edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Marc Guéhi has 1 goals and 1 assists this season; Ezri Konsa has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 18.5% for Marc Guéhi and 19.4% for Ezri Konsa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.0 expected points for Marc Guéhi.

|

Priced at £8.0m and £7.9m, there is a £0.1m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Morgan Gibbs-White generates more points per million this season. Morgan Gibbs-White at 3.5 against Bryan Mbeumo at 3. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Morgan Gibbs-White the edge at 5.6 projected points. With ownership at 15.8% and 21.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has James Tarkowski at 8.6 for Gameweek 6, against 6.0 for Marc Guéhi, a gap of 2.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: James Tarkowski has averaged 8.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Marc Guéhi is averaging 6.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Dominic Calvert-Lewin the clear short-term pick. Dominic Calvert-Lewin carries 4.4 expected points and 4.4 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|

Priced at £5.7m and £6.2m, there is a £0.5m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Brian Brobbey generates more points per million this season. Brian Brobbey at 4.2 against Yoane Wissa at 2.4. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Brian Brobbey the edge at 4.8 projected points. With ownership at 5.9% and 19% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Igor Thiago the clear short-term pick. Igor Thiago carries 2.0 expected points and 2.0 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|

Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Kai Havertz the clear short-term pick. Kai Havertz carries 3.8 expected points and 3.8 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|

Priced at £5.6m and £6.0m, there is a £0.4m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Thierno Barry generates more points per million this season. Thierno Barry at 3.6 against Gonzalo at 2.2. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Thierno Barry the edge at 4.0 projected points. With ownership at 8% and 3.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|