FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 6

The expected points model has Erling Haaland at 7.8 for Gameweek 6, against 6.6 for Alexander Isak, a gap of 1.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Erling Haaland has averaged 7.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Alexander Isak is averaging 6.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Erling Haaland leads on total points and the gap stands at 15. On attacking output, Erling Haaland edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Brian Brobbey has 3 goals and 0 assists this season; Erling Haaland has 5 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 5.9% for Brian Brobbey and 73.4% for Erling Haaland, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 7.8 expected points for Erling Haaland.

|

Priced at £5.8m and £6.0m, there is a £0.2m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Riccardo Calafiori generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 5 against Marc Guéhi at 5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Marc Guéhi the edge at 6.0 projected points. With ownership at 50.7% and 18.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Riccardo Calafiori at 5.8 for Gameweek 6, against 5.0 for Virgil, a gap of 0.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Riccardo Calafiori has averaged 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Virgil is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Lewis Hall leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, Riccardo Calafiori edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Riccardo Calafiori has 0 goals and 2 assists this season; Lewis Hall has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 50.7% for Riccardo Calafiori and 15.7% for Lewis Hall, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.2 expected points for Lewis Hall.

|

Priced at £12.0m and £7.9m, there is a £4.1m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Bryan Mbeumo generates more points per million this season. Bruno Fernandes at 2.5 against Bryan Mbeumo at 3. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Bruno Fernandes the edge at 6.0 projected points. With ownership at 39.6% and 21.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Antoine Semenyo at 6.6 for Gameweek 6, against 6.0 for Bruno Fernandes, a gap of 0.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Antoine Semenyo has averaged 6.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Bruno Fernandes is averaging 6.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Maxim De Cuyper leads on total points and the gap stands at 26. On attacking output, Maxim De Cuyper edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Maxim De Cuyper has 1 goals and 3 assists this season; Ezri Konsa has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 26.2% for Maxim De Cuyper and 19.4% for Ezri Konsa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 7.6 expected points for Maxim De Cuyper.

|

Priced at £6.0m and £5.7m, there is a £0.3m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Joško Gvardiol generates more points per million this season. Marc Guéhi at 5 against Joško Gvardiol at 6.5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Joško Gvardiol the edge at 7.4 projected points. With ownership at 18.5% and 26.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Morgan Gibbs-White at 5.6 for Gameweek 6, against 5.6 for Cole Palmer, a gap of 0.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Morgan Gibbs-White has averaged 5.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Cole Palmer is averaging 5.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Maxim De Cuyper leads on total points and the gap stands at 7. On attacking output, Maxim De Cuyper edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Maxim De Cuyper has 1 goals and 3 assists this season; Lewis Hall has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 26.2% for Maxim De Cuyper and 15.7% for Lewis Hall, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 7.6 expected points for Maxim De Cuyper.

|

Priced at £5.7m and £5.2m, there is a £0.5m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Joško Gvardiol generates more points per million this season. Joško Gvardiol at 6.5 against Lewis Hall at 6. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Joško Gvardiol the edge at 7.4 projected points. With ownership at 26.2% and 15.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has James Tarkowski at 8.6 for Gameweek 6, against 7.4 for Joško Gvardiol, a gap of 1.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: James Tarkowski has averaged 8.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Joško Gvardiol is averaging 7.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Pascal Groß leads on total points and the gap stands at 14. On attacking output, Pascal Groß edges the combined goals and assists count with 7 direct contributions. Pascal Groß has 3 goals and 4 assists this season; Antoine Semenyo has 2 goals and 3 assists. Ownership sits at 25.1% for Pascal Groß and 14.8% for Antoine Semenyo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 9.4 expected points for Pascal Groß.

|

Priced at £4.6m and £6.5m, there is a £1.9m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Virgil generates more points per million this season. Ezri Konsa at 2.6 against Virgil at 3.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Virgil the edge at 5.0 projected points. With ownership at 19.4% and 16.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Dominic Calvert-Lewin at 4.4 for Gameweek 6, against 3.8 for Kai Havertz, a gap of 0.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Dominic Calvert-Lewin has averaged 4.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Kai Havertz is averaging 3.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, James Tarkowski leads on total points and the gap stands at 13. On attacking output, Marc Guéhi edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Marc Guéhi has 1 goals and 1 assists this season; James Tarkowski has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 18.5% for Marc Guéhi and 14.9% for James Tarkowski, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 8.6 expected points for James Tarkowski.

|

Priced at £4.2m and £6.0m, there is a £1.8m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Semi Ajayi generates more points per million this season. Semi Ajayi at 6.4 against Marc Guéhi at 5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Marc Guéhi the edge at 6.0 projected points. With ownership at 14.2% and 18.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has James Tarkowski at 8.6 for Gameweek 6, against 6.2 for Lewis Hall, a gap of 2.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: James Tarkowski has averaged 8.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Lewis Hall is averaging 6.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Alexander Isak leads on total points and the gap stands at 13. On attacking output, Alexander Isak edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Thierno Barry has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Alexander Isak has 4 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 8% for Thierno Barry and 22% for Alexander Isak, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.6 expected points for Alexander Isak.

|

Priced at £5.7m and £9.1m, there is a £3.4m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Brian Brobbey generates more points per million this season. Brian Brobbey at 4.2 against Alexander Isak at 3.6. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Alexander Isak the edge at 6.6 projected points. With ownership at 5.9% and 22% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Yoane Wissa at 3.0 for Gameweek 6, against 2.6 for Gonzalo, a gap of 0.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Yoane Wissa has averaged 3.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Gonzalo is averaging 2.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Thierno Barry the clear short-term pick. Thierno Barry carries 4.0 expected points and 4.0 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|

Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Brian Brobbey the clear short-term pick. Brian Brobbey carries 4.8 expected points and 4.8 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|

The expected points model has Brian Brobbey at 4.8 for Gameweek 6, against 2.6 for Gonzalo, a gap of 2.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Brian Brobbey has averaged 4.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Gonzalo is averaging 2.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|