The expected points model has Erling Haaland at 7.2 for Gameweek 10, against 5.5 for Igor Thiago, a gap of 1.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Erling Haaland has averaged 7.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Igor Thiago is averaging 5.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Maxim De Cuyper leads on total points and the gap stands at 25. On attacking output, Maxim De Cuyper edges the combined goals and assists count with 6 direct contributions. Maxim De Cuyper has 2 goals and 4 assists this season; Joško Gvardiol has 1 goals and 4 assists. Ownership sits at 44.9% for Maxim De Cuyper and 26% for Joško Gvardiol, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 7.8 expected points for Maxim De Cuyper.
|


Priced at £5.9m and £4.7m, there is a £1.2m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Ezri Konsa generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 8.6 against Ezri Konsa at 10.4. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Ezri Konsa the edge at 9.2 projected points. With ownership at 47.9% and 22.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Ezri Konsa at 9.2 for Gameweek 10, against 7.8 for Maxim De Cuyper, a gap of 1.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Ezri Konsa has averaged 9.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Maxim De Cuyper is averaging 7.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, James Tarkowski leads on total points and the gap stands at 3. On attacking output, Riccardo Calafiori edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Riccardo Calafiori has 1 goals and 2 assists this season; James Tarkowski has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 47.9% for Riccardo Calafiori and 18.9% for James Tarkowski, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 5.5 expected points for Riccardo Calafiori.
|
Priced at £5.4m and £6.4m, there is a £1.0m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Maxim De Cuyper generates more points per million this season. Maxim De Cuyper at 12.8 against Virgil at 6.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Maxim De Cuyper the edge at 7.8 projected points. With ownership at 44.9% and 15.1% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Cole Palmer at 4.2 for Gameweek 10, against 1.0 for Bruno Fernandes, a gap of 3.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Cole Palmer has averaged 4.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Bruno Fernandes is averaging 1.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Rayan Cherki leads on total points and the gap stands at 23. On attacking output, Rayan Cherki edges the combined goals and assists count with 6 direct contributions. Rayan Cherki has 4 goals and 2 assists this season; Dominik Szoboszlai has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 35.6% for Rayan Cherki and 13.5% for Dominik Szoboszlai, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 2.8 expected points for Rayan Cherki.
|


Priced at £11.7m and £6.6m, there is a £5.1m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Marcus Tavernier generates more points per million this season. Bruno Fernandes at 3 against Marcus Tavernier at 8.3. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Marcus Tavernier the edge at 6.0 projected points. With ownership at 21.6% and 27.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has James Tarkowski at 2.8 for Gameweek 10, against 1.8 for Joško Gvardiol, a gap of 1.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: James Tarkowski has averaged 2.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Joško Gvardiol is averaging 1.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Joško Gvardiol leads on total points and the gap stands at 7. On attacking output, Joško Gvardiol edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Marc Guéhi has 1 goals and 1 assists this season; Joško Gvardiol has 1 goals and 4 assists. Ownership sits at 16% for Marc Guéhi and 26% for Joško Gvardiol, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 1.8 expected points for Marc Guéhi.
|
Priced at £8.0m and £6.0m, there is a £2.0m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Gabriel generates more points per million this season. Gabriel at 7.3 against Marc Guéhi at 6.2. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Gabriel the edge at 8.2 projected points. With ownership at 24.4% and 16% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Gabriel at 8.2 for Gameweek 10, against 3.5 for Virgil, a gap of 4.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Gabriel has averaged 8.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Virgil is averaging 3.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Alexander Isak leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Francisco Evanilson edges the combined goals and assists count with 8 direct contributions. Francisco Evanilson has 4 goals and 4 assists this season; Alexander Isak has 6 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 17.8% for Francisco Evanilson and 21.6% for Alexander Isak, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 8.5 expected points for Francisco Evanilson.
|
Priced at £4.2m and £8.0m, there is a £3.8m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Semi Ajayi generates more points per million this season. Semi Ajayi at 8.6 against Gabriel at 7.3. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Gabriel the edge at 8.2 projected points. With ownership at 12.5% and 24.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Nicolas Jackson at 8.2 for Gameweek 10, against 4.2 for Charalampos Kostoulas, a gap of 4.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Nicolas Jackson has averaged 8.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Charalampos Kostoulas is averaging 4.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Nicolas Jackson leads on total points and the gap stands at 11. On attacking output, Nicolas Jackson edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Nicolas Jackson has 5 goals and 0 assists this season; Igor Thiago has 2 goals and 3 assists. Ownership sits at 25.8% for Nicolas Jackson and 9.2% for Igor Thiago, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 8.2 expected points for Nicolas Jackson.
|
Priced at £4.2m and £5.3m, there is a £1.1m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Semi Ajayi generates more points per million this season. Semi Ajayi at 8.6 against Lewis Hall at 7.9. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Lewis Hall the edge at 2.8 projected points. With ownership at 12.5% and 20% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Igor Thiago at 5.5 for Gameweek 10, against 5.0 for Alexander Isak, a gap of 0.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Igor Thiago has averaged 5.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Alexander Isak is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Kevin Schade leads on total points and the gap stands at 23. On attacking output, Kevin Schade edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Kevin Schade has 3 goals and 2 assists this season; Dominik Szoboszlai has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 14.3% for Kevin Schade and 13.5% for Dominik Szoboszlai, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 1.5 expected points for Kevin Schade.
|
Priced at £4.2m and £6.4m, there is a £2.2m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Semi Ajayi generates more points per million this season. Semi Ajayi at 8.6 against Virgil at 6.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Virgil the edge at 3.5 projected points. With ownership at 12.5% and 15.1% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Dominic Calvert-Lewin at 3.8 for Gameweek 10, against 3.5 for Kai Havertz, a gap of 0.3 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Dominic Calvert-Lewin has averaged 3.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Kai Havertz is averaging 3.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Charalampos Kostoulas leads on total points and the gap stands at 12. On attacking output, Charalampos Kostoulas edges the combined goals and assists count with 7 direct contributions. Kai Havertz has 3 goals and 0 assists this season; Charalampos Kostoulas has 3 goals and 4 assists. Ownership sits at 5.6% for Kai Havertz and 10.2% for Charalampos Kostoulas, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 4.2 expected points for Charalampos Kostoulas.
|
Priced at £7.4m and £6.0m, there is a £1.4m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Kai Havertz generates more points per million this season. Kai Havertz at 4.5 against Yoane Wissa at 3.3. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Kai Havertz the edge at 3.5 projected points. With ownership at 5.6% and 9.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Thierno Barry at 4.8 for Gameweek 10, against 3.5 for Kai Havertz, a gap of 1.3 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Thierno Barry has averaged 4.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Kai Havertz is averaging 3.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
25 random matchups from the top 10 most-owned defenders, midfielders and forwards for GW10. Ranked by combined ownership. Excludes goalkeepers and ruled-out players. Refreshes each visit.








