

Priced at £6.0m and £15.6m, there is a £9.6m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Dominic Calvert-Lewin generates more points per million this season. Dominic Calvert-Lewin at 3.7 against Erling Haaland at 2.5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Erling Haaland the edge at 7.5 projected points. With ownership at 24.4% and 74% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Erling Haaland at 7.5 for Gameweek 6, against 3.0 for Igor Thiago, a gap of 4.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Erling Haaland has averaged 7.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Igor Thiago is averaging 3.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Erling Haaland leads on total points and the gap stands at 11. On attacking output, Erling Haaland edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Erling Haaland has 5 goals and 0 assists this season; Charalampos Kostoulas has 2 goals and 3 assists. Ownership sits at 74% for Erling Haaland and 5.5% for Charalampos Kostoulas, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 10.0 expected points for Charalampos Kostoulas.
|


Priced at £5.9m and £5.0m, there is a £0.9m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Maxim De Cuyper generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 4.9 against Maxim De Cuyper at 7.6. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Maxim De Cuyper the edge at 8.5 projected points. With ownership at 50.7% and 28.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Erling Haaland the clear short-term pick. Erling Haaland carries 7.5 expected points and 7.5 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Pascal Groß leads on total points and the gap stands at 18. On attacking output, Pascal Groß edges the combined goals and assists count with 7 direct contributions. Pascal Groß has 3 goals and 4 assists this season; Morgan Rogers has 3 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 31% for Pascal Groß and 41.3% for Morgan Rogers, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 15.5 expected points for Pascal Groß.
|
Priced at £7.8m and £7.8m, there is a £0.0m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Rayan Cherki generates more points per million this season. Rayan Cherki at 4.4 against Morgan Rogers at 3.7. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Morgan Rogers the edge at 5.0 projected points. With ownership at 28.5% and 41.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Marc Guéhi at 5.0 for Gameweek 6, against 3.5 for Riccardo Calafiori, a gap of 1.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Marc Guéhi has averaged 5.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Riccardo Calafiori is averaging 3.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Riccardo Calafiori leads on total points and the gap stands at 4. On attacking output, Riccardo Calafiori edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Riccardo Calafiori has 0 goals and 2 assists this season; Virgil has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 50.7% for Riccardo Calafiori and 16.2% for Virgil, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 8.0 expected points for Virgil.
|
Priced at £5.9m and £4.0m, there is a £1.9m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Riccardo Calafiori generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 4.9 against Issa Diop at 3. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Riccardo Calafiori the edge at 3.5 projected points. With ownership at 50.7% and 12.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Martin Ødegaard at 2.5 for Gameweek 6, against 2.5 for Dominik Szoboszlai, a gap of 0.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Martin Ødegaard has averaged 2.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Dominik Szoboszlai is averaging 2.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Morgan Gibbs-White leads on total points and the gap stands at 8. On attacking output, Morgan Gibbs-White edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Morgan Gibbs-White has 1 goals and 2 assists this season; Dominik Szoboszlai has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 15.7% for Morgan Gibbs-White and 32% for Dominik Szoboszlai, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.0 expected points for Morgan Gibbs-White.
|
Priced at £5.0m and £6.0m, there is a £1.0m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Maxim De Cuyper generates more points per million this season. Maxim De Cuyper at 7.6 against Marc Guéhi at 5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Maxim De Cuyper the edge at 8.5 projected points. With ownership at 28.7% and 18% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Dominic Calvert-Lewin at 6.0 for Gameweek 6, against 1.0 for Yoane Wissa, a gap of 5.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Dominic Calvert-Lewin has averaged 6.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Yoane Wissa is averaging 1.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Martin Ødegaard leads on total points and the gap stands at 4. On attacking output, Bryan Mbeumo edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Martin Ødegaard has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Bryan Mbeumo has 2 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 19.9% for Martin Ødegaard and 20.4% for Bryan Mbeumo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 2.5 expected points for Martin Ødegaard.
|


Priced at £6.8m and £8.0m, there is a £1.2m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Martin Ødegaard generates more points per million this season. Martin Ødegaard at 4.3 against Morgan Gibbs-White at 3.5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Morgan Gibbs-White the edge at 5.0 projected points. With ownership at 19.9% and 15.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has James Tarkowski at 11.0 for Gameweek 6, against 5.0 for Marc Guéhi, a gap of 6.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: James Tarkowski has averaged 11.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Marc Guéhi is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Kevin Schade leads on total points and the gap stands at 14. On attacking output, Kevin Schade edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Bryan Mbeumo has 2 goals and 1 assists this season; Kevin Schade has 3 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 20.4% for Bryan Mbeumo and 12.9% for Kevin Schade, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 12.0 expected points for Kevin Schade.
|


Priced at £5.6m and £6.2m, there is a £0.6m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Charalampos Kostoulas generates more points per million this season. Charalampos Kostoulas at 5 against Yoane Wissa at 2.4. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Charalampos Kostoulas the edge at 10.0 projected points. With ownership at 5.5% and 18.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Yoane Wissa the clear short-term pick. Yoane Wissa carries 1.0 expected points and 1.0 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Gonzalo leads on total points and the gap stands at 4. On attacking output, Gonzalo edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Gonzalo has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Igor Thiago has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 4.7% for Gonzalo and 9.3% for Igor Thiago, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 3.0 expected points for Igor Thiago.
|


Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Thierno Barry the clear short-term pick. Thierno Barry carries 4.0 expected points and 4.0 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.
|


The expected points model has Charalampos Kostoulas at 10.0 for Gameweek 6, against 7.0 for Emersonn, a gap of 3.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Charalampos Kostoulas has averaged 10.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Emersonn is averaging 7.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Both Jonah Kusi-Asare and Sindre Walle Egeli have a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled. Neither player is expected to return this week. Compare their form and season stats, but hold off on any captaincy or transfer decision until their fixtures resume. The full head-to-head breakdown is available on the comparison page.
|
Sindre Walle Egeli has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Gonzalo the clear short-term pick. Gonzalo carries 2.0 expected points and 2.0 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.
|
25 random matchups from the top 10 most-owned defenders, midfielders and forwards for GW6. Ranked by combined ownership. Excludes goalkeepers and ruled-out players. Refreshes each visit.







