FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 6

Across the season, Bruno Fernandes leads on total points and the gap stands at 11. On attacking output, Bruno Fernandes edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Bruno Fernandes has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Dominik Szoboszlai has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 39.9% for Bruno Fernandes and 34.5% for Dominik Szoboszlai, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.8 expected points for Bruno Fernandes.

|

Priced at £5.8m and £6.0m, there is a £0.2m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Riccardo Calafiori generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 4.8 against Marc Guéhi at 4.3. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Riccardo Calafiori the edge at 5.6 projected points. With ownership at 50.7% and 18.6% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has James Tarkowski at 5.8 for Gameweek 6, against 5.6 for Riccardo Calafiori, a gap of 0.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: James Tarkowski has averaged 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Riccardo Calafiori is averaging 5.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Morgan Rogers leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Morgan Rogers edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Bryan Mbeumo has 2 goals and 1 assists this season; Morgan Rogers has 3 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 21.5% for Bryan Mbeumo and 40% for Morgan Rogers, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.8 expected points for Morgan Rogers.

|

Priced at £9.7m and £7.0m, there is a £2.7m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Cole Palmer generates more points per million this season. Cole Palmer at 2.9 against Dominik Szoboszlai at 2.6. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Cole Palmer the edge at 5.6 projected points. With ownership at 27% and 34.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Morgan Rogers at 5.8 for Gameweek 6, against 5.4 for Martin Ødegaard, a gap of 0.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Morgan Rogers has averaged 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Martin Ødegaard is averaging 5.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Bruno Fernandes leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, Bruno Fernandes edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Bruno Fernandes has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Martin Ødegaard has 2 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 39.9% for Bruno Fernandes and 20.1% for Martin Ødegaard, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.8 expected points for Bruno Fernandes.

|

Priced at £5.7m and £7.0m, there is a £1.3m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Pascal Groß at 5.8 against Dominik Szoboszlai at 2.6. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Pascal Groß the edge at 6.6 projected points. With ownership at 21.5% and 34.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Cole Palmer at 5.6 for Gameweek 6, against 5.2 for Rayan Cherki, a gap of 0.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Cole Palmer has averaged 5.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Rayan Cherki is averaging 5.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Martin Ødegaard leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Rayan Cherki edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Rayan Cherki has 2 goals and 2 assists this season; Martin Ødegaard has 2 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 28% for Rayan Cherki and 20.1% for Martin Ødegaard, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.4 expected points for Martin Ødegaard.

|

Priced at £6.8m and £9.7m, there is a £2.9m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Martin Ødegaard generates more points per million this season. Martin Ødegaard at 4 against Cole Palmer at 2.9. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Cole Palmer the edge at 5.6 projected points. With ownership at 20.1% and 27% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Cole Palmer at 5.6 for Gameweek 6, against 3.2 for Antoine Semenyo, a gap of 2.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Cole Palmer has averaged 5.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Antoine Semenyo is averaging 3.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Joško Gvardiol leads on total points and the gap stands at 15. On attacking output, Joško Gvardiol edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Joško Gvardiol has 1 goals and 2 assists this season; Lewis Hall has 0 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 25.9% for Joško Gvardiol and 14.9% for Lewis Hall, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.6 expected points for Joško Gvardiol.

|

Priced at £4.9m and £6.1m, there is a £1.2m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Maxim De Cuyper generates more points per million this season. Maxim De Cuyper at 6.5 against James Tarkowski at 4.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Maxim De Cuyper the edge at 6.4 projected points. With ownership at 25.2% and 14.1% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Morgan Gibbs-White at 5.2 for Gameweek 6, against 4.6 for Bryan Mbeumo, a gap of 0.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Morgan Gibbs-White has averaged 5.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Bryan Mbeumo is averaging 4.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Martin Ødegaard leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Morgan Gibbs-White edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Martin Ødegaard has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Morgan Gibbs-White has 1 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 20.1% for Martin Ødegaard and 16% for Morgan Gibbs-White, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.4 expected points for Martin Ødegaard.

|

Priced at £4.2m and £4.6m, there is a £0.4m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Semi Ajayi generates more points per million this season. Semi Ajayi at 6.2 against Ezri Konsa at 2.4. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Semi Ajayi the edge at 5.2 projected points. With ownership at 14.3% and 19.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Dominic Calvert-Lewin at 4.0 for Gameweek 6, against 2.8 for Thierno Barry, a gap of 1.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Dominic Calvert-Lewin has averaged 4.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Thierno Barry is averaging 2.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, James Tarkowski leads on total points and the gap stands at 3. On attacking output, Marc Guéhi edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Marc Guéhi has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; James Tarkowski has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 18.6% for Marc Guéhi and 14.1% for James Tarkowski, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.8 expected points for James Tarkowski.

|

Priced at £6.1m and £6.5m, there is a £0.4m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, James Tarkowski generates more points per million this season. James Tarkowski at 4.8 against Virgil at 2.6. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives James Tarkowski the edge at 5.8 projected points. With ownership at 14.1% and 16.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Alexander Isak at 5.0 for Gameweek 6, against 3.4 for Kai Havertz, a gap of 1.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Alexander Isak has averaged 5.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Kai Havertz is averaging 3.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Dominic Calvert-Lewin leads on total points and the gap stands at 8. On attacking output, Dominic Calvert-Lewin edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Dominic Calvert-Lewin has 2 goals and 1 assists this season; Gonzalo has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 25.7% for Dominic Calvert-Lewin and 3.7% for Gonzalo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 4.0 expected points for Dominic Calvert-Lewin.

|

Priced at £5.7m and £6.2m, there is a £0.5m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Yoane Wissa generates more points per million this season. Brian Brobbey at 1.2 against Yoane Wissa at 2.4. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Yoane Wissa the edge at 3.0 projected points. With ownership at 5.4% and 19.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Thierno Barry at 2.8 for Gameweek 6, against 1.4 for Brian Brobbey, a gap of 1.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Thierno Barry has averaged 2.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Brian Brobbey is averaging 1.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Kai Havertz leads on total points and the gap stands at 5. On attacking output, Kai Havertz edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Gonzalo has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Kai Havertz has 2 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 3.7% for Gonzalo and 8.5% for Kai Havertz, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 3.4 expected points for Kai Havertz.

|