Across the season, Erling Haaland leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Erling Haaland edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Erling Haaland has 5 goals and 0 assists this season; Alexander Isak has 4 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 73.4% for Erling Haaland and 22% for Alexander Isak, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 7.8 expected points for Erling Haaland.
|
Priced at £15.6m and £7.6m, there is a £8.0m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Erling Haaland generates more points per million this season. Erling Haaland at 2.5 against Kai Havertz at 2.5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Erling Haaland the edge at 7.8 projected points. With ownership at 73.4% and 8.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Erling Haaland the clear short-term pick. Erling Haaland carries 7.8 expected points and 7.8 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Bruno Fernandes leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, Bruno Fernandes edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Bruno Fernandes has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Cole Palmer has 2 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 39.6% for Bruno Fernandes and 26.7% for Cole Palmer, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.0 expected points for Bruno Fernandes.
|


Priced at £12.0m and £6.8m, there is a £5.2m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Martin Ødegaard generates more points per million this season. Bruno Fernandes at 2.5 against Martin Ødegaard at 4.3. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Bruno Fernandes the edge at 6.0 projected points. With ownership at 39.6% and 19.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Maxim De Cuyper at 7.6 for Gameweek 6, against 5.0 for Gabriel, a gap of 2.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Maxim De Cuyper has averaged 7.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Gabriel is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Cole Palmer leads on total points and the gap stands at 4. On attacking output, Cole Palmer edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Bryan Mbeumo has 2 goals and 1 assists this season; Cole Palmer has 2 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 21.3% for Bryan Mbeumo and 26.7% for Cole Palmer, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.6 expected points for Cole Palmer.
|
Priced at £4.9m and £6.0m, there is a £1.1m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Maxim De Cuyper generates more points per million this season. Maxim De Cuyper at 7.8 against Marc Guéhi at 5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Maxim De Cuyper the edge at 7.6 projected points. With ownership at 26.2% and 18.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Rayan Cherki at 6.8 for Gameweek 6, against 6.6 for Antoine Semenyo, a gap of 0.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Rayan Cherki has averaged 6.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Antoine Semenyo is averaging 6.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Maxim De Cuyper leads on total points and the gap stands at 13. On attacking output, Maxim De Cuyper edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Maxim De Cuyper has 1 goals and 3 assists this season; Virgil has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 26.2% for Maxim De Cuyper and 16.3% for Virgil, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 7.6 expected points for Maxim De Cuyper.
|
Priced at £4.9m and £5.2m, there is a £0.3m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Maxim De Cuyper generates more points per million this season. Maxim De Cuyper at 7.8 against Lewis Hall at 6. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Maxim De Cuyper the edge at 7.6 projected points. With ownership at 26.2% and 15.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Marc Guéhi at 6.0 for Gameweek 6, against 5.0 for Gabriel, a gap of 1.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Marc Guéhi has averaged 6.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Gabriel is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Pascal Groß leads on total points and the gap stands at 14. On attacking output, Pascal Groß edges the combined goals and assists count with 7 direct contributions. Pascal Groß has 3 goals and 4 assists this season; Antoine Semenyo has 2 goals and 3 assists. Ownership sits at 25.1% for Pascal Groß and 14.8% for Antoine Semenyo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 9.4 expected points for Pascal Groß.
|
Priced at £6.0m and £4.6m, there is a £1.4m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Marc Guéhi generates more points per million this season. Marc Guéhi at 5 against Ezri Konsa at 2.6. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Marc Guéhi the edge at 6.0 projected points. With ownership at 18.5% and 19.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Antoine Semenyo at 6.6 for Gameweek 6, against 4.8 for Bryan Mbeumo, a gap of 1.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Antoine Semenyo has averaged 6.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Bryan Mbeumo is averaging 4.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Semi Ajayi leads on total points and the gap stands at 15. On attacking output, Semi Ajayi edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Semi Ajayi has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Ezri Konsa has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 14.2% for Semi Ajayi and 19.4% for Ezri Konsa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.4 expected points for Semi Ajayi.
|
Priced at £6.1m and £6.5m, there is a £0.4m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, James Tarkowski generates more points per million this season. James Tarkowski at 7 against Virgil at 3.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives James Tarkowski the edge at 8.6 projected points. With ownership at 14.9% and 16.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Alexander Isak at 6.6 for Gameweek 6, against 2.0 for Igor Thiago, a gap of 4.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Alexander Isak has averaged 6.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Igor Thiago is averaging 2.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Brian Brobbey leads on total points and the gap stands at 9. On attacking output, Brian Brobbey edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Brian Brobbey has 3 goals and 0 assists this season; Yoane Wissa has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 5.9% for Brian Brobbey and 19% for Yoane Wissa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 4.8 expected points for Brian Brobbey.
|
Priced at £6.0m and £6.2m, there is a £0.2m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Yoane Wissa generates more points per million this season. Gonzalo at 2.2 against Yoane Wissa at 2.4. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Yoane Wissa the edge at 3.0 projected points. With ownership at 3.7% and 19% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Kai Havertz at 3.8 for Gameweek 6, against 2.0 for Igor Thiago, a gap of 1.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Kai Havertz has averaged 3.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Igor Thiago is averaging 2.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Brian Brobbey leads on total points and the gap stands at 5. On attacking output, Brian Brobbey edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Brian Brobbey has 3 goals and 0 assists this season; Kai Havertz has 2 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 5.9% for Brian Brobbey and 8.5% for Kai Havertz, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 4.8 expected points for Brian Brobbey.
|


Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Kai Havertz the clear short-term pick. Kai Havertz carries 3.8 expected points and 3.8 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.
|
The expected points model has Gonzalo at 2.6 for Gameweek 6, against 2.0 for Igor Thiago, a gap of 0.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Gonzalo has averaged 2.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Igor Thiago is averaging 2.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Brian Brobbey leads on total points and the gap stands at 11. On attacking output, Brian Brobbey edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Brian Brobbey has 3 goals and 0 assists this season; Gonzalo has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 5.9% for Brian Brobbey and 3.7% for Gonzalo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 4.8 expected points for Brian Brobbey.
|
25 random matchups from the top 10 most-owned defenders, midfielders and forwards for GW6. Ranked by combined ownership. Excludes goalkeepers and ruled-out players. Refreshes each visit.
















