FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 6

Across the season, Bruno Fernandes leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Bruno Fernandes edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Bruno Fernandes has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Morgan Rogers has 3 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 39.6% for Bruno Fernandes and 40.1% for Morgan Rogers, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.0 expected points for Bruno Fernandes.

|

Priced at £5.7m and £15.6m, there is a £9.9m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Brian Brobbey generates more points per million this season. Brian Brobbey at 4.2 against Erling Haaland at 2.5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Erling Haaland the edge at 7.8 projected points. With ownership at 5.9% and 73.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Joško Gvardiol at 7.4 for Gameweek 6, against 5.8 for Riccardo Calafiori, a gap of 1.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Joško Gvardiol has averaged 7.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Riccardo Calafiori is averaging 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Rayan Cherki leads on total points and the gap stands at 5. On attacking output, Rayan Cherki edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Rayan Cherki has 3 goals and 2 assists this season; Morgan Rogers has 3 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 27.9% for Rayan Cherki and 40.1% for Morgan Rogers, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.8 expected points for Rayan Cherki.

|

Priced at £12.0m and £7.8m, there is a £4.2m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Rayan Cherki generates more points per million this season. Bruno Fernandes at 2.5 against Rayan Cherki at 4.4. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Rayan Cherki the edge at 6.8 projected points. With ownership at 39.6% and 27.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Cole Palmer at 5.6 for Gameweek 6, against 4.0 for Dominik Szoboszlai, a gap of 1.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Cole Palmer has averaged 5.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Dominik Szoboszlai is averaging 4.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Bryan Mbeumo leads on total points and the gap stands at 4. On attacking output, Bryan Mbeumo edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Bryan Mbeumo has 2 goals and 1 assists this season; Dominik Szoboszlai has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 21.3% for Bryan Mbeumo and 33.9% for Dominik Szoboszlai, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 4.8 expected points for Bryan Mbeumo.

|

Priced at £7.8m and £5.8m, there is a £2.0m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Rayan Cherki at 4.4 against Pascal Groß at 8.1. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Pascal Groß the edge at 9.4 projected points. With ownership at 27.9% and 25.1% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Maxim De Cuyper at 7.6 for Gameweek 6, against 2.4 for Ezri Konsa, a gap of 5.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Maxim De Cuyper has averaged 7.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Ezri Konsa is averaging 2.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Joško Gvardiol leads on total points and the gap stands at 7. On attacking output, Joško Gvardiol edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Marc Guéhi has 1 goals and 1 assists this season; Joško Gvardiol has 1 goals and 3 assists. Ownership sits at 18.5% for Marc Guéhi and 26.2% for Joško Gvardiol, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 7.4 expected points for Joško Gvardiol.

|

Priced at £4.9m and £6.5m, there is a £1.6m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Maxim De Cuyper generates more points per million this season. Maxim De Cuyper at 7.8 against Virgil at 3.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Maxim De Cuyper the edge at 7.6 projected points. With ownership at 26.2% and 16.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Gabriel at 5.0 for Gameweek 6, against 2.4 for Ezri Konsa, a gap of 2.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Gabriel has averaged 5.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Ezri Konsa is averaging 2.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Maxim De Cuyper leads on total points and the gap stands at 7. On attacking output, Maxim De Cuyper edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Maxim De Cuyper has 1 goals and 3 assists this season; Lewis Hall has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 26.2% for Maxim De Cuyper and 15.7% for Lewis Hall, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 7.6 expected points for Maxim De Cuyper.

|

Priced at £5.7m and £6.1m, there is a £0.4m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, James Tarkowski generates more points per million this season. Joško Gvardiol at 6.5 against James Tarkowski at 7. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives James Tarkowski the edge at 8.6 projected points. With ownership at 26.2% and 14.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Pascal Groß at 9.4 for Gameweek 6, against 5.6 for Morgan Gibbs-White, a gap of 3.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Pascal Groß has averaged 9.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Morgan Gibbs-White is averaging 5.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, James Tarkowski leads on total points and the gap stands at 18. On attacking output, James Tarkowski edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Gabriel has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; James Tarkowski has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 22.9% for Gabriel and 14.9% for James Tarkowski, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 8.6 expected points for James Tarkowski.

|

Priced at £5.2m and £4.6m, there is a £0.6m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Lewis Hall generates more points per million this season. Lewis Hall at 6 against Ezri Konsa at 2.6. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Lewis Hall the edge at 6.2 projected points. With ownership at 15.7% and 19.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Brian Brobbey at 4.8 for Gameweek 6, against 4.4 for Dominic Calvert-Lewin, a gap of 0.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Brian Brobbey has averaged 4.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Dominic Calvert-Lewin is averaging 4.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, James Tarkowski leads on total points and the gap stands at 12. On attacking output, Lewis Hall edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Lewis Hall has 1 goals and 1 assists this season; James Tarkowski has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 15.7% for Lewis Hall and 14.9% for James Tarkowski, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 8.6 expected points for James Tarkowski.

|

Priced at £6.0m and £6.0m, there is a £0.0m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Dominic Calvert-Lewin generates more points per million this season. Dominic Calvert-Lewin at 3.7 against Gonzalo at 2.2. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Dominic Calvert-Lewin the edge at 4.4 projected points. With ownership at 25.5% and 3.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Brian Brobbey at 4.8 for Gameweek 6, against 2.0 for Igor Thiago, a gap of 2.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Brian Brobbey has averaged 4.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Igor Thiago is averaging 2.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Igor Thiago the clear short-term pick. Igor Thiago carries 2.0 expected points and 2.0 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|

Priced at £5.7m and £7.6m, there is a £1.9m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Brian Brobbey generates more points per million this season. Brian Brobbey at 4.2 against Kai Havertz at 2.5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Brian Brobbey the edge at 4.8 projected points. With ownership at 5.9% and 8.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Kai Havertz at 3.8 for Gameweek 6, against 2.6 for Gonzalo, a gap of 1.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Kai Havertz has averaged 3.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Gonzalo is averaging 2.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Brian Brobbey leads on total points and the gap stands at 11. On attacking output, Brian Brobbey edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Brian Brobbey has 3 goals and 0 assists this season; Gonzalo has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 5.9% for Brian Brobbey and 3.7% for Gonzalo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 4.8 expected points for Brian Brobbey.

|